HB 355-MOBILE TELECOMMUNICATIONS TAX  CHAIRMAN STEVENS announced HB 355 to be up for consideration. MS. AMY ERICKSON, Staff to Representative Murkowski, said: State and local governments tax mobile telecommunication services in a variety of ways. Because of the mobility of wireless equipment determining which state and local taxes apply can be very complicated. The process of determining where a transaction is taxable is commonly referred to as sourcing. In order to create a more uniform system for taxing wireless calls, Congress passed a Mobile Telecommunications Act in 2000. States now have until August 1 of this year to conform to the federal act and those states failing to conform will be preempted from imposing taxes on most calls made outside of where the customers' primary use occurs - those so-called roaming customers - to another jurisdiction. HB 355 conforms state law to federal law to clarify that mobile telecommunications services are subject to taxation in the users' primary place of use, the residential or business address where the customers' use of the mobile service primarily occurs. Passage will prevent multiple taxation and allow the state to appropriately tax wireless services and eliminate confusion as to where to tax the wireless calls. This bill does not impact the rate of taxes or fees that state and localities impose on the wireless calls or the types of calls subject to taxes. It's revenue neutral. Each jurisdiction with taxing authority will continue to determine to tax calls and at what rates. The Mobile Telecommunications Sourcing Act was crafted by industries, state and local tax officials and is endorsed by such entities as the National Governor's Association, the League of Cities and the Federal Tax Administration. MR. DARRELL BELL, AT&T, said he was available to answer questions. CHAIRMAN STEVENS wanted to make sure that this bill clarifies that there is only one jurisdiction. MS. ERICKSON explained further that if as a customer, she had established Anchorage as her home, that means she could "roam" to Seattle and Phoenix and Anchorage will always be able to tax her call. Conversely, we can't tax anyone making a call from here who lives in Seattle. SENATOR LEMAN moved to pass CSHB 355(CRA) from committee with individual recommendations and the accompanying $0 fiscal note. There were no objections and it was so ordered.