SB 191-JOINT AVIATION INSURANCE ARRANGEMENTS  CHAIRMAN PHILLIPS announced SB 191 to be up for consideration. SENATOR TAYLOR, sponsor, said he has a committee substitute that would provide for some of the concerns that were raised during the first hearing. "In essence, the authority would fall within the regulatory authority of the Division of Insurance and would require various reporting requirements and reserves requirements." MS. SARAH MACNEAR GROVE, Property Casualty Actuary, Division of Insurance, said they worked with Senator Taylor and prepared some changes. She pointed out that safety issues are very important and any entity that deals with such a high-risk business needs to address safety. The other thing was that the CS forms a joint insurance arrangement. AS 21.77.020 talks about regulations by the Division of Insurance in an annual report. It says, "A joint aviation insurance arrangement may not be considered insurance for the purpose of any other law of the state and is not subject to regulations adopted by the Director." She explained that statement takes it outside of anything that would happen in Title 21. "Because this is a risky business, we would prefer to see some of the protections in Title 21 apply to such an entity." CHAIRMAN PHILLIPS asked if she had a problem with the bill as drafted. MS. GROVE answered: It does say that this is not subject to regulations adopted by the director and it is not to be considered insurance, which means that it would not be subject to Title 21. Because of the nature of this type of insurance, we think some of the protections in Title 21 are important. SENATOR TORGERSON asked on page 3, line 26, "How do you have and maintain a surplus no less than the amount equal to the total of the capital of one half of the surplus?" MS. GROVE answered, "I believe the capital and surplus requirements for domestic stock insure they have to have $1 million in capital and $1 million in surplus. So, this would say you have $1 million in capital and $500,000 in surplus." SENATOR TORGERSON asked if that was somewhere else in Title 21. MS. GROVE answered, "Yes, a reciprocal insurer has the same requirement." SENATOR TAYLOR said that was the reason he put that in - to make certain that they had to meet that same standard. He said, "If you look back to the other provisions, we have both agreed that even though I don't want regulation by the department, that there will probably be a significant amount of regulation…" CHAIRMAN PHILLIPS asked Ms. Grove if they would come up with a position on this bill. MS. GROVE indicated they would look at it closer. Number 700 SENATOR TORGERSON moved to pass SB 191 out of committee with individual recommendations. CHAIRMAN PHILLIPS noted that they had to adopt the committee substitute first. SENATOR TORGERSON removed his motion to move the bill and moved that the committee adopt LS 0590F/Ford 4/28/01. There were no objections and it was so ordered. SENATOR TORGERSON moved to pass CSSB 191(L&C) out of committee with individual recommendations. There were no objections and it was so ordered.