SB 176-DISTRIBUTORSHIPS    CHAIRMAN PHILLIPS announced SB 176 to be up for consideration. MR. JOHN HAXBY, Waukeshaw Alaska Corporation of Anchorage, said he would answer questions. MR. ED SNIFFEN, Department of Law, said they don't have any concerns with this bill, but he has two recommendations. One deals with the definition of the required payment by a distributor to a dealer of merchandise that's held as inventory. On page 2, line 6, language currently requires the distributor to pay the dealer 100 percent of the net cost of any merchandise that he might have in his inventory at the time of a termination of a dealership. Inventory depreciates over time and it may or may not be worth what the dealer pays, but he suggested changing it to something more like on page 3, lines 11 and 12, which states that the distributor is required to pay a commercially reasonable business value for that inventory. Also, under the exemption section on page 5, line 5, the distributorship agreement for the sale, repair or servicing of motor vehicles that are required to get registered are excluded from the bill and MR. SNIFFEN said he would add some language to that definition that would include "franchise agreement" to make it clear that automobile franchise agreements between manufacturers and dealers are also excluded. He said other than those recommendations, Mr. Sniffen said he supports the bill. MR. HAXBY responded to the issue of depreciating merchandise, that in many cases while it may depreciate for tax purposes, many times the inventory valuation increases as the sectors increase prices. So, he thought it would be better to leave the language as it is. MS. DEBORAH LUPER, Eagle River, said she would answer questions. MR. SNIFFEN clarified that these really aren't technical problems; they're more suggestions and they don't have strong feelings one way or another about any of those things. SENATOR TORGERSON noted page 2, line 6, where it says 100 percent of net merchandise except for repair parts, and said the first thing that came to his mind is what happens if you're a merchandiser of repair parts. MR. HAXBY said he understood what he was saying and that he was correct. SENATOR TORGERSON moved on page 2, line 6, to delete ", except repair parts,". There were no objections and it was so ordered. MR. HAXBY concurred with the motion. SENATOR LEMAN asked if that amendment would affect language on lines 2 that said: "85 percent of the current net price for repair parts." MR. HAXBY answered, "It should not affect it as line 2 is to include superceded parts." SENATOR LEMAN moved to pass CSSB 176 (L&C) from committee with the accompanying fiscal note and individual recommendations. There were no objections and it was so ordered.