SB 141-PROCUREMENT: CONTRACTS/SUBCONTRACTS MR. JEREMY KERR, UAS Intern for Senator Leman, said SB 141 was introduced at the request of DOTPF to give the Department greater flexibility in contracts known as "design build", where the owner (in this case, the state) chooses a contractor that will build as well as design a project. Two examples of this are the M/V Kennicott and the Whittier Tunnel. Usually, the owner picks a design and then has the contractor build it. This bill is in the best interest of the State and will only affect state contracts. Current law states that construction contractors must list the subcontractors they plan on using within five days of the award of the contract. Because of the nature of design build contracts, it is not always possible for the contractor to identify the needed subcontractors. This provides flexibility to DOTPF to allow contractors to provide that information at a later date. This bill also changes a request to change contractors to be in writing. MR. KERR said there is no opposition from either the design or construction community that they know of. CHAIRMAN MACKIE asked what was the fiscal impact of this bill. MR. KERR said there were zero fiscal impacts. Number 320 MR. MARK O'BRIEN, Chief Contracts Officer, DOTPF, said that the two issues they are trying to address are design/build construction contracts where they cannot list subcontractors within five days., because in a lot of cases, they don't know whether it's going to be a piling contractor or a concrete contractor for the design of the foundation of a building, for instance. The second thing this does is allow them to substitute or add subcontractors when it's in the state's best interest. An example of this would be discovering that you need an asbestos or lead abatement contractor after starting the project. SENATOR LEMAN asked how often the Department uses the design/build approach versus the more conventional approach. MR. O'BRIEN answered rarely. He is aware of only two last year and about five in the last three years. A number of them have been sand storage buildings. SENATOR LEMAN said the CS has a new Section 3 which rewords language to give comfort to the design community about what conditions in AS 36.30.115 may still apply. It doesn't change any of the substance. SENATOR LEMAN moved to adopt the Banister CS to SB 141. There were no objections and it was so ordered. SENATOR LEMAN moved to pass CSSB 141 from committee with individual recommendations with the zero fiscal note. There were no objections and it was so ordered.