SB 297-RETURN OF SEIZED PROPERTY  2:26:04 PM CHAIR FRENCH announced the consideration of SB 297. He noted the proposed committee substitute (CS). SENATOR WIELECHOWSKI moved to adopt the proposed CS for SB 297, labeled 26-LS1536\E, as the working document. CHAIR FRENCH objected for discussion purposes. SENATOR DYSON, sponsor of SB 297, said the CS clarifies three things at the request of the Department of Law: 1) Page 1, line 9, clarifies that "interested parties" identified in version R, includes the prosecution, defense and other interested parties. 2) Page 2, lines 1-2 adds the language "or another interested party", to address those situations where a third is claiming an ownership and possessory interest in the property. 3) Page 2, line 3, replaces the word "receiving" in version R, with "claiming". This clarifies that the person making the request for return of property may not receive the property from the court. SENATOR DYSON referenced the letters of support in the packet and noted that the Office of Victims' Rights said DOL endorsed the bill. Although DOL doesn't oppose the bill, it's an overstatement to say they endorsed it. 2:27:59 PM SENATOR WIELECHOWSKI questioned whether this meshes with other laws that require law enforcement to retain property - DNA evidence in particular. SENATOR DYSON explained that the bill aims to return valuable or beneficial property to victims of property crimes. The goal is to make the victims whole as quickly as possible without compromising the prosecution. CHAIR FRENCH noted that the gist of that is captured on page 2, lines 1-2. The law enforcement agency can always step up and say it has to retain the property, which would help the court make a decision. SENATOR DYSON added that he anticipates that a judge might tell the property owner that he or she can't sell the property until the case is settled. CHAIR FRENCH removed his objection and version E was before the committee. 2:29:47 PM SENATOR MCGUIRE moved to report CS for SB 297 from committee with individual recommendations and attached fiscal note(s). There being no objection, CSSB 297(JUD) moved from the Senate Judiciary Standing Committee.