SB 297-RETURN OF SEIZED PROPERTY  2:17:57 PM CHAIR FRENCH announced the consideration of SB 297. SENATOR FRED DYSON, sponsor of SB 297, noted that he has a committee substitute (CS) to propose. 2:18:46 PM CHUCK KOPP, Staff to Senator Dyson, said SB 297 ensures that seized property is held only as long as is necessary so as to not jeopardize the case. The bill provides in Title 12 an identifiable process for an individual to petition the court for the recovery of their property in circumstances where they are not otherwise able to reach agreement with interested parties. MR. KOPP related that prosecutors statewide have indicated that the current process could use refinement, particularly when the property is of significant value. The Alaska Peace Officers' Association has endorsed the proposed CS, which additionally states that within 10 days of a request for return of property and upon reasonable notice to interested parties, the agency shall request a hearing before the court. CHAIR FRENCH asked for a motion to adopt the CS. 2:21:49 PM SENATOR COGHILL moved to adopt the judiciary work draft CS for SB 297, labeled 26-LS1536\R, as the working document. There being no objection, version R was before the committee. CHAIR FRENCH noted the letter of support from law enforcement and asked the sponsor if he had anything else to say about the bill. SENATOR DYSON related anecdotal stories to demonstrate the need and noted that some heavy equipment operators don't call the police when their equipment is stolen because the return time is too long. 2:24:53 PM ANNE CARPENETI, Attorney, Criminal Division, Department of Law (DOL), said getting property back to victims of crime is very important, but the problem is that the state sometimes needs to hold the seized property as evidence in a criminal procedure. The defense often has an interest in that too. She said she is concerned and would like to talk to the sponsor about the 10-day limit for retaining the property after a request and the provision that allows both the defense bar and the prosecution to weigh in. If the police have to give the evidence back it breaks the chain of custody. She also suggested the possibility of cross referencing this with other bills. For example, a bill under consideration now pertains to retention of evidence for a long period of time. She summarized that the bill is generally a good idea and DOL could support the concept but it has concerns. 2:27:19 PM SENATOR MCGUIRE joined the committee. CHAIR FRENCH asked Ms. Carpeneti at the next hearing to provide concrete ideas about how to address the concerns she articulated and announced he would hold SB 297 in committee.