SB 323-WORKERS COMPENSATION AND CONTRACTORS  CHAIR SEEKINS called the meeting back to order. Senators French, Ogan, Therriault and Chair Seekins were present. CHAIR SEEKINS informed members that one question that came up on this bill had to do with its effect on a sole proprietor or partner with no employees. He has asked Todd Larkin to work on a proposed amendment to address that scenario. He explained that under the current statute, a sole proprietor or a partner without any employees could be exempt from the requirement to have workers' compensation coverage for them. If either had employees, they would be required to have coverage. He said the proposed amendment would say if the sole proprietor or partner does not have workers' compensation coverage, the project owner or contractor is released from any claims that could be brought under workers' compensation up the ladder. He clarified that a sole proprietor or partner is not required to have workers' compensation coverage but, if they make that choice, their exclusive remedy is against themselves, not who they are working for. MR. JACK MILLER, an attorney with the Alaska State Chamber of Commerce, informed members that he spoke with Mr. Larkin that morning and was made aware of the issue relating to sole proprietors and partners. He recommended addressing that issue in AS 23.30.239, which specifically deals with sole proprietors and partners and allows them to opt in or out of the workers' compensation system. He suggested the simplest fix would be to add subsection (e) to AS 23.30.239 to read: A sole proprietor or a member of a partnership, who does not elect coverage as an employee under this chapter, may not make a claim for compensation in respect of an injury, disability or death against a contractor or other employer. SENATOR OGAN remarked that he was a sole proprietor for 25 years and did not have workers' compensation coverage. He was always willing to take that risk and would not have considered trying to hold someone else responsible for any injuries he sustained. He stated strong support for the proposed amendment and declared that he may have a conflict of interest at some point in the future. CHAIR SEEKINS announced that he would have an amendment drafted and bring it up at the afternoon meeting.