SB 58-PFD INELIGIBILITY/MOTOR VEHICLE INSURANCE  CHAIR RALPH SEEKINS asked for a motion to adopt the committee substitute (CS) as the working document. SENATOR GENE THERRIAULT made a motion to adopt CS \H Cook.2 4/2/03 as the working document. There being no objection, it was so ordered. SENATOR COWDERY asked his staff to explain the changes and the reasons for those changes. CRYSTAL MOORE, staff to Senator John Cowdery, explained CS SB 58 [Version H] amends AS 43.23.005 (g) to add "and (i)" to (d)(1) of the section and "(i)(2)" to (d)(2)(B). The latter takes out all programs and departments to which the PFD is appropriated when a person loses his or her PFD and the money stays in the general fund SENATOR SCOTT OGAN clarified the money stays in the corpus of the permanent fund, not the general fund. MS. MOORE agreed. CHAIR SEEKINS added it would actually stay in the realized earnings of the reserve account. SENATOR COWDERY said yes. SENATOR GENE THERRIAULT explained the Legislature makes an annual appropriation for dividends; the money goes into an account and dividends are paid from that account. An individual that is convicted of a DUI wouldn't get a dividend so that money would stay in the dividend fund to be distributed equally among other eligible recipients. Frequently, when the PFD is garnished for a court settlement, the court considers that to be the fine or penalty. He understands that the prime sponsor doesn't want the dividend to be available to pay the fine. He intends that the violator lose the dividend and also pay the court fine. SENATOR COWDERY said that was his intent. A DUI conviction would make an individual ineligible to receive a PFD and the funds would not be disbursed to an agency to satisfy that or any other obligation. SENATOR OGAN asked if it is correct that the money would stay in the earnings reserve. SENATOR THERRIAULT said it would not and restated his explanation. CHAIR SEEKINS said the earnings reserve brings the money over to the Legislature who then makes the appropriation to the dividend account. He asked Senator Ellis if that was correct. SENATOR JOHNNY ELLIS said that was correct and Senator Therriault clearly understood the process. 1:22 pm  SENATOR HOLLIS FRENCH asked if he understood correctly that driving without insurance and DUI convictions would be treated differently than any other PFD forfeitures. SENATOR COWDERY replied that is correct. The language in SB 58 and SB 59 is similar, but language in SB 59 also covers municipalities. CHAIR SEEKINS verified that the bill applies just to convictions in Alaska and isn't retroactive. MS. MOORE confirmed; the bill applies to convictions for driving without auto insurance in Alaska only and it is not retroactive. SENATOR OGAN made a motion to move CSSB 58(JUD) from committee with individual recommendations and attached fiscal notes. There being no objection, it was so ordered.