HB 49-EXTEND TERMINATION DATE FOR BD OF PAROLE    Ms. Candace Brower, Legislative Liaison for the Department of Corrections, explained that the legislation extends the termination date of the board of parole. Originally the extension date was 2006 and the House amended the date to maintain the parole board in its current status until 2008. CHAIRMAN TAYLOR announced that the CS before the committee was the House bill. SENATOR THERRIAULT asked what percentage of incarcerated individuals comes before the parole board and how the dynamics have changed since mandatory minimums were instituted. MS. BROWER did not know that the percentage of individuals eligible for discretionary parole had changed but the number of mandatory paroles has increased with the number of offenders. The workload on the mandatory parole has to do with the number of parole violators. Individuals who are released on mandatory parole have their case reviewed by a parole board member who then determines the supervisory requirements for that offender. Because the paroles are mandatory, there are some parolees who are not successful and their parole is revoked. At that time, there is a full board adjudicatory hearing. Although she did not have any figures, she thought the annual parole board report should give percentages of discretionary parole hearings held as well as the number of mandatory parole revocation hearings. SENATOR THERRIAULT stated his reason for asking stemmed from a constituent who was on probation and questioned the need for a parole board since instituted mandatory good time and mandatory minimums had automated so much of the system. MS. BROWER responded that there were still a significant number of discretionary parole hearings held. SENATOR THERRIAULT noted that the monetary outlay was about $450,000.00 per year. MS. BROWER agreed. CHAIRMAN TAYLOR asked that the record reflect his pleasure regarding the work that has been done by the current and past parole boards. There has been no abuse of discretion in this state, which indicates that good judgment is being exercised. SENATOR COWDERY moved CSHB 49(FIN) from committee with individual recommendations. There being no objection, CSHB 49(FIN) moved from committee with individual recommendations.