SB 210-LIMITS ON RIGHT TO PRIVACY    SENATOR PETE KELLY, bill sponsor, testified that the legislation gives the court direction in addressing issues in areas of privacy. CHAIRMAN TAYLOR asked whether Senator Kelly had reviewed the amendment Senator Therriault had prepared. SENATOR KELLY acknowledged he had and he supported the amendment. SENATOR THERRIAULT moved draft A.1 of amendment 1 for SB 210 for the committee consideration. CHAIRMAN TAYLOR explained that Section 1 provides for the implementation of the right to privacy within Alaska Statute 01.10. In the beginning of the statute books there is a general provisions section that provides guidance to the three branches on those generic items such as how to repeal or affect an amendment. These general provisions have an effect on all the laws the legislature passes as well as the interpretation of those laws by the executive and judicial branches. Therefore, if the legislature is amending the statutes to provide for the implementation of the right to privacy, then it is appropriate to provide for the same implementation language in the generic section of statutes that provide guidance to the executive and judicial branches. He thanked Senator Kelly for bringing the legislation before the committee and Senator Therriault for offering the amendment. He asked for further discussion. There was no response and amendment 1 passed. He then offered the following as amendment 2: On page 1, lines 4-5 strike the words "to benefits for unmarried partners." On line 6 strike "extend to" and insert "create". Strike the last word on line 6 and all of lines 7 and 8. On line 6, after the word "receive" insert "public money, a public benefit, or a public service. On lines 13-14, strike "to state funding for abortions." On line 15, strike the words "extend to" and insert "create". After the word "receive" strike "state funding" and insert "public money, a public benefit, or a public service." On page 2, line 1 strike "for abortion." SENATOR KELLY said he understood the amendment. He added that, in light of the Duke Law Review finding the Alaska Courts the most liberal in the United States, there is no way to anticipate what the courts will do when it comes to implementing social change that he finds unacceptable. The language inserted in amendment 2 is less specific but it anticipates "further outrages by the court." CHAIRMAN TAYLOR called for additional discussion or objection to amendment 2 and received no response. There being no objection, amendment 2 passed. There being no additional testimony, he asked for a motion. SENATOR COWDERY moved SB 210, as amended, from committee with individual recommendations. There being no objection, CSSB 210(JUD) moved from committee with individual recommendations.