SB 201-DNA TESTING & REGISTRATION DEPUTY COMMISSIONER DEL SMITH, Department of Public Safety (DPS), explained that the 1995 DNA law only allowed for the taking of DNA samples from convicted offenders for violent crimes. SB 201 expands the offense of violent crimes to include felony burglaries. A person convicted of a felony burglary after January 1, 1996 will be obligated to provide a DNA sample for the DNA registry. SB 201 also changes the law to reflect current technology--medical personnel will no longer be necessary for the collection of blood samples, saliva DNA samples will be taken with a swab. Number 448 CHAIRMAN TAYLOR noted that the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) has filed a document with the Judiciary Committee. He noted that during the last meeting the ACLU's concerns were addressed and testimony was taken on those concerns. CHAIRMAN TAYLOR noted that DNA sampling has also been used to acquit people. SENATOR TORGERSON said he was not sure he liked what was being done in section 1. He asked if a DNA sample can be collected without a court order. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER SMITH replied that when there is a court order a DNA sample must be given at the time a person is sentenced. SENATOR TORGERSON asked if this is stated in AS 11.56.760 because section 1 does not say this. Section 1 allows for anyone to collect a DNA sample. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER SMITH said section 1 just adds to current law-- because medical personnel are not always available for the collection of a sample. DPS believes that allowing a correctional officer, probation officer, or police officer to take a swab will be more efficient. CHAIRMAN TAYLOR explained that the question was whether or not a police officer or probation officer or correctional officer can order a person to give a DNA sample. Chairman Taylor said he reads section 1 to say that one of these people can only order a person to give a sample if testing is part of the sentence imposed under AS 12.55.015 or if the person has been convicted of an offense that requires DNA testing. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER SMITH responded that a person has to be convicted of those offenses stated in statute. SENATOR TORGERSON said this must be stated in an earlier part of AS 11.56. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER SMITH said yes, it was passed in 1995. SENATOR TORGERSON asked why there is a retroactive date for samples. Number 660 DEPUTY COMMISSIONER SMITH said it matches the original date of collections--the start of the DNA registry. A number of people have been convicted of felony burglary since 1995 and DPS would like to collect samples from them. He said it seemed logical at the time but there are a number of people concerned with this aspect of the bill. SENATOR TORGERSON asked if a court order will be needed for the collection of samples. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER SMITH answered that a person has to commit an offense that matches the statutory requirement or whether or not DNA testing is part of the sentence--it cannot be done otherwise. CHAIRMAN TAYLOR said it will not be part of sentencing, it will be based on section 1 and 2 of the bill. Number 880 MS. CANDACE BROWER, Department of Corrections (DOC), urged the committee to pass SB 201. MR. ELMER LINDSTROM, Department of Health and Social Services (DHSS), said that DHSS supports passage of SB 201.