SB 286-DUTIES AND POWERS OF ATTORNEY GENERAL CHAIRMAN TAYLOR moved to delete on page 1, line 5 the words "state, including the," because an inherent conflict is generated. This restores the original language of the bill requiring the attorney general to be subject to the power of the legislature in making appropriations and settling civil action cases. There being no objection, amendment 1 carried. Number 1305 SENATOR DONLEY recommended a new provision saying the attorney general shall defend the constitution of Alaska. SENATOR DONLEY moved to insert in Section 1(b), (1) defend the constitution of the state of Alaska, and to renumber the rest of the section accordingly. There being no objection, amendment 2 carried. MR. MARK JOHNSON, Subcommittee on Privatization for the Department of Law (DOL), noted the legislature has the ability to define the scope and nature of the responsibilities of the AG. CHAIRMAN TAYLOR asked Mr. Johnson to further discuss the remaining provisions on page 2 of SB 286--both the new language and the deleted language. MR. JOHNSON commented that on page 2, lines 8 and 9 there is a significant deletion relating to common law powers. This language was deleted because, if a limited constitutional government is desired, the powers granted should not reflect a blank check, which is what the present language reflected. The addition of subsection (c) will set into statutory law that which was believed to be the case all along. Number 1426 CHAIRMAN TAYLOR moved to amend line 15 by adding the words "enact laws." The following is how Section 1(c) will read: (c) The attorney general may, subject to the power of the legislature to enact laws, make appropriations,.... There being no objection, amendment 3 carried. Number 1597 SENATOR ELLIS commented he thinks it is a mistake to eliminate the common law powers of the AG. He wonders what specific abuse of power has cause the Chairman to want to limit the office like this in the future. There are areas of the law that change rapidly, and he does not understand why the committee should want to minimize the powers of the office rather than leave them as they are--being fairly expansive in terms of purview and power. Legislatures are slow to keep up with changing areas of the law and it is good to know there is a chief legal officer who will keep up with these things and exercise power in the public interest. Number 1658 CHAIRMAN TAYLOR commented that he and Senator Ellis would like an analogy of specific abuses that went beyond the AG's power, and where that abuse limited the private sector or stifled business in some way. MR. JOHNSON noted the Exxon Valdez settlement is an example of where things were stretched about as far as they could go. SENATOR DONLEY said Cleary and Molly Hootch are also examples of the AG's abuse of power. CHAIRMAN TAYLOR asked Mr. Johnson to get back to the committee with a further analysis on this subject. SENATOR DONLEY moved SB 286 as amended from committee with individual recommendations. SENATOR ELLIS objected. The roll was taken on the motion. Voting yea: SENATOR HALFORD, SENATOR DONLEY and CHAIRMAN TAYLOR. Voting nay: SENATOR ELLIS, and so the motion carried.