SB 114-IMPERSONATE POLICE/EMERGENCY VEHICLE SENATOR ELLIS moved that the committee rescind its previous action in adopting the committee substitute for SB 114 for the purpose of a corrective amendment. There being no objection, the motion carried. SENATOR ELLIS explained that Mr. Luckhaupt brought his concerns about the committee substitute to his staff's attention. He prepared a new committee substitute that corrects the problem. SENATOR ELLIS moved to adopt the original defective amendment. There was objection to the motion. The motion failed with Senators Ellis, Donley, Halford and Taylor voting "nay." SENATOR ELLIS moved to adopt the Senate Judiciary Committee substitute for SB 114 (Luckhaupt 4/23, Version G). There being no objection, the motion carried. MR. JERRY LUCKHAUPT, legislative counsel and drafter of the committee substitute, informed committee members they had just adopted the incorrect committee substitute. SENATOR ELLIS moved to rescind the committee's motion to adopt the committee substitute to SB 114 (Luckhaupt 4/23, Version G). MR. LUCKHAUPT explained that Senator Ellis's previous amendment presented two problems. First, it is worded in the present tense so it would allow an affirmative defense to someone who was not a member of a community patrol at the time of the offense but who subsequently joined one after he/she was cited for a violation. He stated he believes the intent of the amendment was to allow an affirmative defense to those who belonged to a community patrol at the time of the offense. The second problem is associated with what is an organized community patrol within a community or municipality. Many problems have occurred over the years with which groups are recognized as community councils by a city. In some instances, dueling community councils were formed, each one asserting that it is the community council for the town. The Legislature has, for the most part, stayed out of those arguments. The problem with the amendment is that any group can say it is a community patrol for a particular area. He addressed that problem in the new committee substitute by inserting language that says one is a member of a community patrol organized with, or in cooperation with, the municipality or a community council that is established under municipal ordinance or charter. Therefore the municipality will decide who the community councils are. That comports with the two instances that he is aware of in which the Legislature dealt with community councils in statute; one dealing with citing of prison facilities, the other allowing communities to comment on proposed public works projects. Both statutes refer to community councils established under municipal charter or ordinance. Number 120 SENATOR ELLIS moved to adopt the draft, labeled Luckhaupt 5/12 Version K, as the Senate Judiciary committee substitute for SB 114. There being no objection, the motion carried. CHAIRMAN TAYLOR asked Senator Ellis if the new committee substitute addresses Senator Phillips' concern. SENATOR ELLIS said it does as best as he can tell. CHAIRMAN TAYLOR said he does not want to interfere with the very active community involvement in Senator Phillips' area. SENATOR ELLIS moved CSSB 114(JUD) from committee with individual recommendations. There being no objection, the motion carried.