SB 162-RULE AGAINST PERPETUITIES BETH CHAPMAN, an attorney with the law firm of Faulkner Banfield, stated she is testifying on behalf of herself and her colleagues, Mary Zemp and Eric Keifner. They have an extensive practice in trust and estate law, and have seen significant movement in that area by the Legislature in the last several years. SB 162 will make a technical correction to the Alaska Trust Act, adopted on April 2, 1977. That Act effectively repealed the rule against perpetuities, a rule rooted in the common law that prohibits trusts from existing for longer than approximately 90 to 110 years. The legislature repealed that rule so that trusts, established pursuant to that act, could be created to allow families to pass assets down through the generations. Unfortunately, the Alaska Trust Act did not deal with perpetual charitable lead trusts which are established to provide income to a charity for a specified term. When the Alaska Trust Act was enacted to repeal the rule against perpetuities, it focused on persons living at the time, so it does not apply to charities. She noted people would like to establish charitable lead trusts in Alaska but are unable to do so. SENATOR HALFORD asked for a description of a charitable lead trust. MS. CHAPMAN explained an individual may establish a trust and choose to pay all of of the trust's income to a charity for the first 20 years. After 20 years, the money can revert to the grantor or possibly to the grantor's heirs. Charitable lead trusts are established pursuant to the Internal Revenue Code and qualify for the charitable deduction. SENATOR DONLEY asked if the full value of the trust can be taken as a tax deduction. MS. CHAPMAN answered no, the actuarial value is taken as a deduction. CHAIRMAN TAYLOR asked if that is because it will be tied up for the 20 year period. MS. CHAPMAN said that is correct, and explained that the income generated by the trust is deducted because it is paid to a charity. MS. CHAPMAN pointed out the Alaska Trust Act was established to generate business and make Alaska a favored location for trusts, so, while many people have expressed interest in establishing charitable lead trusts in Alaska, they cannot because of the technical problem regarding the rule against perpetuities. CHAIRMAN TAYLOR asked Ms. Chapman to testify on SB 163 while she was present.