SJUD - 2/27/95 SB 3 ANTITRUST EXEMPTION FOR FISHERMEN SENATOR DUNCAN, sponsor of SB 3, read a sponsor statement to the committee. He noted the Senate passed an identical bill to SB 3 last year, however the measure did not reach the House floor for a vote. SB 3 allows commercial fishermen to form associations to collectively negotiate raw or processed fish prices with processors, however it does not authorize processors to agree among themselves. It only covers collective bargaining between fishermen and a processor or a group of processors. SB 3 gives a state antitrust exemption as a first step, which is necessary to obtaining Congressional approval for a federal exemption. SB 3 would stabilize Alaska's fishing industry. SB 3 also removes ambiguities between state and federal laws. Number 339 JERRY McCUNE, President of the United Fishermen of Alaska, testified in support of SB 3. He commented that during a strike in Bristol Bay, the processors were invited to discussions, however under the Sherman Antitrust law, processors cannot collectively gather to discuss prices, therefore they were unable to participate. SENATOR TAYLOR expressed concern that the passage of SB 3 would create a second step in which the processors will demand the same exemption so that they can collectively gather to determine prices. MR. McCUNE replied SB 3 forbids that practice, as does the federal law. He added the fishermen are the self employed individuals bargaining with the industry. Number 367 SENATOR TAYLOR agreed, but pointed out that neither party can do that under current law, therefore once one party is given the exemption, the other might request the same. MR. McCUNE noted processors can back out of negotiations and post a price. DORNE HAWXHURST, President of Cordova District Fishermen United (CDFU), testified in support of SB 3. She stated the CDFU supports the measure for three reasons: it clarifies ambiguities in existing state law; it evens the playing field for fishermen; and it removes inconsistencies between federal and state laws. Number 406 ED CRANE testified on his own behalf in support of SB 3. He emphasized the strength of his personal conviction resulting from his many years of involvement in agribusiness. He stated most other states have an antitrust exemption and he felt SB 3 will help to set the scene for changes necessary to the fishing industry as they must have stability in supply and price to compete in world food markets. He commented adversarial relationships between harvesters and processors have to end, and SB 3 will help to make that happen. SENATOR TAYLOR asked Dwight Perkins and Dean Paddock if they were opposed to SB 3. Both replied negatively, and Mr. Paddock noted he strongly supported SB 3. SENATOR GREEN moved SB 3 out of committee with individual recommendations. There being no objection, the motion passed.