SENATOR TAYLOR returned SB 73 (LIABILITY OF DESIGN- CONSTRUCTION PROFESSIONALS) to committee and invited HENRY SPRINGER, on teleconference in Anchorage, to give testimony. MR. SPRINGER suggested the committee read the sponsor statement in the record that covers all of the issues very well, and he added a couple of suggestions. He explained buildings were not built with a prescribed maintenance schedule, and it is critical to distinguish at what point the liability by the design and construction professionals business ends. After a prolonged period, he explained it was impossible to assign 100% fault because of the activities beyond the control of the designers and builders. Number 124 MR. SPRINGER listed the states that have adopted the State of Repose. In speaking for the Associated General Contractors, MR. SPRINGER said they supported the bill and requested the committee to consider 8 years instead of 10 years in keeping records. Next to testify was DICK CATTANACH, a local contractor in Anchorage. MR. CATTANACH spoke to the bill as being one of fairness, and he described the process he goes through in commercial construction in building for knowledgeable intelligent owners. He reviewed the statute of limitations for the Internal Revenue Service as 3 years, 5 years for the State of Alaska for crimes against property, ethics violations in the Legislature is 5 years, crimes against people in the State of Alaska is 10 years, and no statute of limitations for murder - or for construction. MR. CATTANACH described the impossible situation of trying to recreate the paper trail of records and participants and the difficulty in defending themselves after a period of time - especially for small Mom and Pop contractors in the State of Alaska. Number 187 Last to testify from Anchorage was DOUG GREEN, an architect representing the Alaska Design Council and the American Institute of Architects. He said he would also be testifying for two other architects, STEPHEN PETERS in Ketchikan and RICH RITTER in Juneau. MR. GREEN said they were all in favor of SB 73 and have been working with it for quite few years. He wanted to be sure the committee understood how the Statue of Repose is different from the Statute of Limitation, and he gave some statistical information on claims against design professionals. Number 260 SENATOR TAYLOR welcomed SENATOR LEMAN and explained, at some point, the bill was going to have to support a cut off number, as suggested by MR. SPRINGER. He said it must be achieved to give some finality to the design and construction people, who are forever purchasing insurance tails and carrying around quantities of records. He described the problems incurred by these professionals in defending themselves from a suit. SENATOR TAYLOR discussed with SENATOR LEMAN and SENATOR DONLEY the provisions and limitations of the legislation, and SENATOR LEMAN expressed his preference for 6 to 10 years in the Statute of Repose. Number 308 SENATOR DONLEY explained why he supported a 20 year proposal, and SENATOR LEMAN voiced his objections to anything over 10 years.