SENATOR TAYLOR introduced his bill, SB 69 (RIGHT TO USE LAWFUL PRODUCTS) and invited MIKE MCMULLEN, from the Department of Administration, to testify. MR. MCMULLEN explained some history on related legislation from the previous session, and he said the Department of Personnel had a problem with the legislation, having to do with off-duty conduct by law enforcement officers. He said off-duty conduct was recognized in other places, and he gave an example. He thought the employer should be able to take action. MR. MCMULLEN explained some amendments were offered in Labor and Commerce Committee and refused, but the amendments have since been rewritten by the Department of Law. He reviewed the provisions in the new amendments, with one dealing with job performance standards in on-the-job conduct, and the other dealing with health insurance issues. He proposed a third amendment parallel to number one, which would allow employers to take disciplinary action for conduct in off- duty hours under certain circumstances. MR. MCMULLEN defended the amendments. Number 150 SENATOR TAYLOR and MR. MCMULLEN discussed examples of discipline, probationary periods, poor judgement, and standards of conduct on the part of the people in the examples. SENATOR TAYLOR said he was not able to move the bill because of a lack of quorum. MR. TOMA quoted a caller on a call-in program as asking whether it was proper for foster parents to smoke, and MR. TOMA said he didn't think foster parents, as employees of the state on a 24 hour basis, should be allowed to smoke. He suggested the bill was a smoker's and drinker's bill of rights, but he thought the conduct should be considered. MR. TOMA didn't think a child should be subjected to a person who smokes or drinks - especially if the state is paying for the conduct. Number 214 SENATOR TAYLOR asked MR. MCMULLEN to respond, and he said the Division of Personnel didn't view foster parents as employees. MR. MCMULLEN explained the distinction was off- duty conduct. They continued to discuss MR. MCMULLEN'S objections to the legislation.