SB 117-INSURANCE FOR SCHOOL DISTRICTS ROBERT KROGSENG, staff to Senator Taylor, discussed a proposed amendment designed to address concerns raised about the definition of earthquake zones at the last meeting. He noted while doing research for the amendment, it came to his attention that the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) is in the process of changing its terminology and will be designating earthquake contours rather than zones. The national building code staff plans to adopt new terminology as well. The proposed amendment replaces the words "an active seismic area" with "areas where ground motions exceed 0.2 of a second, spectral acceleration of 75 percent gravity, as delineated on a ground motion map for Alaska based on USGS Geologic Investigation Series Maps 1-2679." Committee packets contain a map that outlines the areas that meet the new delineation; those areas were previously referred to as zones 3 and 4. The USGS is in the process of creating a map for the Legislature that will define the areas more clearly. SENATOR ELTON asked how such a map will affect insurance company claims if insurance companies consider the entire state to be an active seismic area. MR. KROGSENG said it is his understanding that insurance companies essentially work off of, and with, the building codes and that the new terminology will be adopted into the building codes. SENATOR ELTON asked whether municipalities with their own building codes will have to make that change. MR. KROGSENG replied that all building codes are currently being combined into one nationwide code. Most municipalities have an automatic reference to the latest building code, others adopt each new code as it is released. Number 093 SENATOR ELTON asked for an explanation of the definition. MR. KROGSENG said that structural problems occur when the ground motion is higher than the number contained in the definition. Most structural specifications can withstand less ground motion. SENATOR WILKEN moved to adopt Amendment 1. SENATOR ELTON objected and said originally, the bill only addressed a perceived problem with regulations that pertain to flood insurance for schools, and he is not sure the bill is necessary at all. The bill now attempts to fix a problem with earthquake insurance when no school district has testified that it is a problem. The motion to adopt Amendment 1 carried with Senators Pete Kelly, Wilken and Miller voting "yea," and Senator Elton voting "nay." SENATOR ELTON moved to delete, on page 1 line 9, "(1)" to put a period after "flood prone area" on line 11, and to delete the remaining language on lines 11 through 13. The net effect of Amendment 2 will be to strike all references in the bill to earthquakes. SENATOR WILKEN objected and said the intent of the bill is to save money, and that rather than have to revisit the issue in the future, it makes sense to address earthquake insurance now. SENATOR ELTON maintained that legislating for problems that have not occurred is difficult. In addition, he is not convinced that a new definition of earthquake zones will be used by insurance companies to determine rates. The motion to adopt Amendment 2 failed with Senator Elton voting "yea," and Senators Wilken, Kelly and Miller voting "nay." There being no further discussion on SB 117, SENATOR WILKEN moved SB 117 as amended out of committee with individual recommendations and its accompanying fiscal note. SENATOR ELTON objected. The motion carried with Senators Kelly, Wilken and Miller voting "yea," and Senator Elton voting "nay."