SB 237 - COUNCIL DOMESTIC VIOLENCE & SEXUAL ASSAULT Anne Carpeneti, Assistant Attorney General, Department of Law, explained that Section 7 of CSSB 237 was changed to read "acts of domestic violence" rather than "crimes of domestic violence," in relation to using such evidence in a domestic violence prosecution. She pointed out that the change brings into the evidence rules the practice most judges use today. When a judge is considering entry of evidence of a prior bad act, the party attempting to introduce the evidence raises the issue before the judge, outside of the presence of the jury. The judge listens to arguments in favor of, and in opposition to, the admission of evidence by the prosecution and the defense. The judge then considers whether the evidence is relevant, reliable, and whether other evidence rules apply such as whether the evidence was based on hearsay. If the judge decides the evidence has passed that test, the judge then applies Evidence Rule 403, which requires that the prejudicial effect of the evidence not outweigh its probative value. Once the judge has made his/her determination, the evidence is or is not admitted and heard by the jury, depending on the judge's decision. SENATOR GREEN asked if, in legal terms, crimes involving domestic violence and acts of domestic violence differ. MS. CARPENETI replied that in terms of this particular rule, there should be no difference. Crimes involving domestic violence are defined, in Title 18 of Alaska statutes, as certain crimes against certain people. The court would interpret acts of domestic violence by the same definition as it would interpret crimes involving domestic violence. The problem with using the word "crime" is that at least one judge is interpreting that to mean a conviction rather than an act. The committee took a brief at-ease. SENATOR LEMAN moved CSSB 237 from committee with individual recommendations. SENATOR ELLIS objected and asked if the provision to extend the life of CDVSA is still in the bill. SENATOR GREEN replied that provision is on page 3, line 10. Number 113 SENATOR ELLIS asked if the other language in the bill was requested by Senator Leman. SENATOR LEMAN explained parts of SB 316 were rolled into this bill at his and Senator Parnell's request. SENATOR ELLIS asked whether the committee had received any testimony from the domestic violence treatment community about the bill. CHAIRMAN WILKEN replied Ms. Andreen testified in support of the legislation on the previous Friday. SENATOR ELLIS asked if the committee substitute had been adopted. CHAIRMAN WILKEN stated it had. SENATOR ELLIS removed his objection to move CSSB 237 from committee, therefore the motion carried.