SENATE BILL NO. 216 "An Act relating to the calculation of state aid for schools that consolidate; relating to the determination of the number of schools in a district; and providing for an effective date." 9:15:41 AM Co-Chair MacKinnon recalled a question from Senator Stevens regarding the cost to the state. 9:16:04 AM JONATHAN KING, STAFF, SENATOR NATASHA VON IMHOFF, discussed a brief history of the reason for the legislation. He stated that the purpose of the bill was to promote the efficient use of Alaska's existing K-12 education infrastructure. He highlighted the sections of the bill. Co-Chair MacKinnon wondered whether the state would pick up the cost for transportation. 9:18:57 AM HEIDI TESHNER, DIRECTOR, FINANCE AND SUPPORT SERVICES, DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION AND EARLY DEVELOPMENT, (DEED)stated that the formula program in statute was a block grant. She stated that there would be no increase to the state, as long as the per pupil student amounts currently in statute remained unchanged. She noted that districts may see an increase in transportation costs. Co-Chair MacKinnon queried additional comments. ELWIN BLACKWELL, SCHOOL FINANCE MANAGER, SCHOOL AND FINANCE FACILITIES SECTION, DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION AND EARLY DEVELOPMENT, replied in the negative. Co-Chair MacKinnon wondered whether the total transportation program would not increase. Ms. Teshner replied in the affirmative Co-Chair MacKinnon surmised that the state would not be responsible for any decisions or financing required for increased transportation costs for individual schools. Ms. Teshner agreed. Senator Micciche wondered why the bill would save the state some level of funding after year four, but was not adequately reflected in the fiscal note. Ms. Teshner agreed. She looked at page 3 of the fiscal note, which explained the reason for the lack of reflection. She stated that it was because it was unknown which schools would consolidate, in order to determine the state savings. Co-Chair MacKinnon agreed that the fiscal note had some cost, but another that did not reflect the intended savings. She stressed that there was no increased funding from the state level. Vice-Chair Bishop MOVED to REPORT CSSB 216(FIN) out of committee with individual recommendations and accompanying fiscal notes. There being NO OBJECTION, it was so ordered. CSSB 216(FIN) was REPORTED out of committee with a "do pass" recommendation and with one new fiscal impact note from the Department of Education and Early Development and one new zero fiscal note from the Department of Education and Early Development. 9:23:45 AM AT EASE 9:26:15 AM RECONVENED