SENATE BILL NO. 104 "An Act relating to the duties of the state Board of Education and Early Development; and relating to school curriculum." 4:19:29 PM PAUL PRUSSING, DIRECTOR OF STUDENT LEARNING, DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION AND EARLY DEVELOPMENT, introduced himself. DON ENOCH, SPECIAL EDUCATION ADMINISTRATOR, DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION AND EARLY DEVELOPMENT, introduced himself. Co-Chair MacKinnon stated that there were some questions about Individualized Education Programs (IEPs). Senator Stevens wondered whether all IEPs were equally valid. He was concerned about the possible savings of time. He wondered whether a school district with an IEP would want to change that IEP. He wondered whether an IEP would be considered a finished absolute document. Mr. Enoch replied that the IEP was transferrable from district to district. He asserted that some districts had different standards allowed for a district level. He stated that, at that time, the district would have an abbreviated meeting to address those small points. He noted that, because of the differences in paperwork between districts, it was slightly more labor intensive. Senator Micciche noted it was an atmosphere-specific document, because of the different specialties, instructors, and setting. He felt that the document was a "starting point" at a new school, when a child arrives at a new district. Mr. Enoch replied that the IEP was designed to be as flexible as necessary. Senator Stevens queried the online advantages versus a 30- page paper. Mr. Enoch replied that software companies had developed ways to guide people through certain scenarios to ensure compliance-accurate responses. The largest problem for most teachers was the paperwork. Senator Stevens wondered whether the state agencies dealt with IEPs or whether the districts completely oversaw the IEPs. Mr. Enoch replied that the IEPs were reviewed on a 4- year rotation for all the small districts; and annually in all the large districts. 4:24:20 PM Senator von Imhof noted that it was a recommendation per the performance review of DEED in 2016. She shared that it was found that there were multiple software platforms utilized by the 53 school districts across the state, and it was found to be an inefficient system. The recommendation was for a more standard software platform initiated by DEED available to districts. Co-Chair MacKinnon noted the document outlining the benefits for parents, teachers, schools, districts, and the state. She noted that parents had complete access to student files at all time. She highlighted the benefits. Senator Micciche explained the fiscal note. 4:31:07 PM DR. MARK STOCK, DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT, ANCHORAGE SCHOOL DISTRICT (via teleconference) felt that it was appropriate that all Alaskan students had the best curriculum materials available within budget. He used a construction analogy to explain the bill. He felt that the bill helped to ensure the best infrastructure available. He hoped that there would be realistic expectations. Vice-Chair Bishop queried the monetary value to evaluate the curriculum. Dr. Stock replied that the K-5 materials were approximately $6 million. He furthered that millions of dollars would be spent for implementation. He stated that grant funds would be used to hire instructional coaches to ensure that the materials were used properly. Co-Chair MacKinnon CLOSED public testimony SB 104 was HEARD and HELD in committee for further consideration.