SENATE BILL NO. 22 "An Act relating to the collection costs for the municipal motor vehicle registration tax; and providing for an effective date." 2:36:47 PM SENATOR CATHY GIESSEL, SPONSOR, introduced the bill. She explained that since the inception of the motor vehicle registration tax system in 1993, the cost to the state (in collecting taxes for municipalities) had been reduced considerably, while the rate charged to communities had not. SB 22 proposed to reduce the amount that the state collected from each community that signed on to the program. She directed attention to the second page of FN 1, and discussed the list of communities in which local motor vehicle taxes were collected and 8 percent was retained by the state. She pointed out that the communities did not incur 8 percent cost to conduct the tax collecting activity, and the bill proposed to reduce the administrative fee to 5.5 percent. The proposed amount was more closely calculated to the actual cost for the Division of Motor Vehicles (DMV). She emphasized that there were no new costs or fees to the state, and the bill left more money in the communities. Co-Chair MacKinnon OPENED public testimony. 2:39:35 PM DANIEL MOORE, TREASURER, MUNICIPALITY OF ANCHORAGE, ANCHORAGE (via teleconference), testified in support of the bill. He related that in 2012, the Municipality of Anchorage increased its rate schedule for the motor vehicle registration program, almost doubling the rates to match the rates of Mat-Su. He described the disproportionate administrative costs of the tax collection after the dramatic increase in fees, despite the fact that the scope of work was unchanged. He estimated that the Municipality of Anchorage was paying the DMV about $500,000 more per year than it had in prior years. He added that the Anchorage area had 45 percent of all registered vehicles in the state, and prior to 2012 it paid 45 percent of the administrative cost to DMV. Due to the rate schedule update, the municipality currently paid 59 percent of the administrative cost. By changing the statutory rate from 8 percent to 5.5 percent, the new payment amount would be proportionate and benefit the participating communities. He estimated the each community would gain about 3 percent additional revenue if the bill successfully passed into law. 2:42:02 PM Co-Chair MacKinnon CLOSED public testimony. Co-Chair MacKinnon reiterated that the committee was working on the capital budget, and would stand in recess until later in the day. SB 22 was HEARD and HELD in committee for further consideration. 2:42:55 PM RECESSED 8:50:51 PM RECONVENED