CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 344(FIN) "An Act relating to the salmon product development tax credit; and providing for an effective date by amending an effective date in sec. 7, ch. 57, SLA 2003, as amended by sec. 4, ch. 3, SLA 2006, and by sec. 4, ch. 8, SLA 2008." PETE ECKLUND, STAFF, REPRESENTATIVE BILL THOMAS, explained the bill. He related that the salmon product development tax credit is an incentive to add value to Alaska salmon in Alaska. It originated with the salmon industry task force in 2002 and was one of the key bills to come out of that effort. It was put into law in 2003. At the time, market conditions were very poor and there was a lot of competition from farmed salmon. The credit allows processors to claim up to 50 percent of the cost of a qualified investment against their fisheries business tax. The taxpayer has four years to claim the credit and can deduct 50 percent of their annual tax bill until the credit is satisfied. Mr. Ecklund listed the qualifying equipment: filet machine, pin bone machines, glazing and smoking equipment, roe equipment, and ice making systems. The equipment must be new, predominantly used for salmon, and used for making value-added products. Mr. Ecklund related the positive outcomes of the bill. The bill would extend the program to 2015. He stressed the immediate need to extend the program in order for the industry to continue long-range investment planning. 9:45:56 AM Senator Huggins noted the title of the bill said "salmon product". He asked if the bill applies to all fish. Mr. Ecklund said it only applies to salmon. Co-Chair Stedman noted one zero fiscal note from the Department of Revenue. MARK PALMER, OCEAN BEAUTY SEAFOODS (via teleconference), spoke in support of the bill. He spoke of the success of the program and future plans for his company. 9:49:00 AM Co-Chair Stedman pointed out residual effects of the credit. MARY MCDOWELL, VICE PRESIDENT, PACIFIC SEAFOOD PROCESSORS ASSOCIATION (via teleconference), testified strongly in favor of the bill. She added that the tax credit only covers a portion of the expense of equipment, not marketing and other costs. It does provide an economic incentive. HB 344 was heard and HELD in Committee for further consideration.