CS FOR HOUSE JOINT RESOLUTION NO. 2(FIN) Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the State of Alaska requiring an affirmative vote of the people before any form of gambling for profit may be authorized in Alaska and setting other requirements. 9:40:00 AM AT EASE: 9:40:03 AM RECONVENED: 9:40:19 AM REPRESENTATIVE NANCY DAHLSTROM presented an overview of the house joint resolution. She explained that this bill would create a constitutional amendment that places the question for permitting for-profit gaming in Alaska on the general election ballot. The resolution states that in order for there to be for-profit gaming in Alaska their must be an affirmative majority by the state voters. In addition, the local communities must then approve, by a majority, gaming in their area. The local vote requirement was added in the House to assure balance for smaller communities. 9:42:48 AM Senator Dyson questioned how this would affect gambling on Native Alaskan lands. Representative Dahlstrom reported that she is not sure as this is not yet resolved. 9:43:32 AM Senator Olson inquired how this would affect non-profit gaming in Alaska. Representative Dahlstrom reported this bill would not affect any gaming activity already in law. Co-Chair Stedman asked what would be the affect on Annette Island, the only native reservation in Alaska. Representative Dahlstrom advised that Annette Island is a part of Alaska and the community would need to abide by the same regulations as the rest of the state. If the residents wished to have gaming in their area, it would have to be by majority vote of the community. Co-Chair Stedman pointed out that Annette Island is treated differently by other Alaska departments, such as fish and game laws. He wondered if there had been any research on the special status of Annette Island in regard to gaming. Representative Dahlstrom responded she could not comment on the policy for Annette Island. 9:45:09 AM Senator Elton asked if the state or municipal vote would occur first. Representative Dahlstrom reported that the state elections would happen first. Senator Elton expressed that some pull-tabs are on behalf of non-profits. He questioned if the businesses that ran these non-profit pull-tabs were considered for-profit organizations would they be prohibited from conducting this service without a vote by the people. Representative Dahlstrom specified that pull-tabs are legal in the state and nothing in existing state law would change. 9:46:29 AM Senator Elton asked how a new pull-tab seller would be treated. Representative Dahlstrom repeated that this would not change those gaming businesses already allowed by state law. 9:47:20 AM Senator Thomas questioned where in the bill it states the continuation of those gaming activities already allowed by state law. 9:48:13 AM KELLY GOODE, STAFF, REPRESENTATIVE DALSTROM answered Senator Thomas's question by indicating Section 2 (b), page 2, states: (b) This section does not prohibit or restrict any form of gaming lawfully conducted under Alaska law on the date of the ratification of this section by the people of Alaska, nor does this section affect the authority of the legislature to authorize or regulate nonprofit gaming by organized boroughs and cities or by nonprofit organizations. AT EASE: 9:49:46 AM RECONVENED: 9:53:02 AM 9:53:45 AM Ms. Goode explained that the difference between the Judiciary and Finance version of the bills was that if the state election votes affirmatively, then the local communities would get a chance to vote on allowing gaming in their community. 9:54:54 AM Senator Elton asked what happens when both a borough and a city is involved. 9:55:41 AM Ms. Good replied it would depend on where the gaming occurs. If the gaming was to be held within the city, then the vote would be there; if outside the city but within the borough, then the borough would vote. 9:56:27 AM Ms. Goode remarked that the House Finance Committee wanted to ensure this was a two-tier system with both state and local voting. Senator Elton acknowledged he is not a supporter of legalized gambling and the back-up material relates the negative impacts on families. Co-Chair Stedman noted that this new resolution has just been seen by the Committee and there has not been enough time to thoroughly consider the resolution. 9:58:38 AM Senator Olson suggested that since there would be a state- wide election first, all Alaskans would have an influence if gambling would be allowed. Senator Elton recounted that the state can authorize gambling but the communities need to feel comfortable. 9:59:05 AM Co-Chair Hoffman stressed that this was actually a three- tier system. First there would be the vote to amend the Alaska Constitution, followed by a state-wide vote then the vote on the municipal level. He believed the voters of Alaska should decide whether they wanted gambling in the state. If the voters approve gambling then in order for it to be implemented, Alaskans would vote on the local level. If the voters vote against gambling in the state then this should be a clear message that gambling is not wanted. 10:00:52 AM Ms. Goode replied that the House felt that some larger communities could determine the outcome by their larger populations which initiated the addition of the local community vote. 10:01:57 AM REPRESENTATIVE HARRY CRAWFORD indicated that it was the sponsor's intention to have a statewide vote to settle the question about gambling. As it moved through committees it evolved to also getting a vote in local communities and the sponsor's were fine with this idea. 10:02:55 AM Senator Huggins inquired if this would have an effect on cruise ship industry. Representative Crawford replied that there will not be any effect if they stay in outside waters. 10:03:32 AM Co-Chair Stedman reviewed the fiscal note. Senator Thomas requested more information on the cruise ship tax. CS HJR 2 (FIN) was HEARD and HELD in Committee for further consideration. AT EASE: 10:05:34 AM RECONVENED: 11:17:42 AM