SENATE BILL NO. 120 "An Act relating to the calculation and payment of unemployment compensation benefits; and providing for an effective date." Co-Chair Hoffman MOVED to ADOPT Work Draft for SB 120, 25- LSO622/N, Wayne, 3/14/08. Co-Chair Stedman OBJECTED. DARWIN PETERSON, STAFF, SENATOR STEDMAN, explained that there are three main changes: · Sec. 9, line 7, changed to 2 year phase in for the decreased contribution rate paid by the employer. Instead of going from 80% to 73% in one year, the phase in would be 76% beginning January 1, 2009 and 73% beginning January 1, 2010. · Page 6, line 13, Sec. 10 creates the two year phase in for the increased contribution rate paid by the employee. The rate would change to 24% beginning January 1, 2009 and 27 % beginning January 1, 2010. · Sec. 13, 14 and 15 have been deleted. He explained that section 13 was a conforming amendment that is no longer needed with the deletion of section 14. Section 14 is the automatic annual recalculation of the benefit amount (escalator clause). Sec. 15 was deleted as it conflicted with federal law. He referenced the handout of federal tax code Chapter 23 - Federal Unemployment Tax Act (On File). Co-Chair Stedman WITHDREW his OBJECTION. There being NO OBJECTION, CSSB120 (FIN) 25-LSO622/N, Wayne, 3/14/08 was adopted. 10:10:03 AM DANA OWEN, STAFF, SENATOR ELLIS, presented SB 120. He informed the Committee that for the last 11 years the maximum weekly benefit amount for unemployment insurance has remained at $248. He explained that the intent of SB 120 is to raise unemployment insurance to $370. Senator Olson asked if the Sponsor agreed with the changes in the Committee Substitute. Mr. Owen said the Sponsor is fine with the change and believes it is an improvement to the bill. Senator Olson asked if those effected by the changes in the CS have commented on the change. 10:12:37 AM Mr. Owen acknowledged that the escalator clause may not stay in the bill. He explained that members of both houses have discussed the automatic adjustment to benefit amounts (escalator clause, Sec. 15). There are many who oppose these adjustments and Senator Ellis had anticipated this and discussed the issue with others, but there is no public testimony on record regarding the changes. Senator Thomas said he is pleased to see the increase in the amount. He would prefer to see the escalator clause in the bill, but is not concerned with its removal. 10:14:26 AM Co-Chair Hoffman MOVED to REPORT CSSB 120(FIN) out of Committee with individual recommendations and the accompanying fiscal notes. Co-Chair Stedman OBJECTED and asked if the Administration had an opinion on the bill. 10:15:24 AM PAULA SCAVERA, LEGISLATIVE LIAISON, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT, said there was no comment from the Department. Co-Chair Stedman WITHDREW his OBJECTION. There being NO OBJECTION, it was so ordered. AT EASE: 10:16:20 AM RESUME: 10:17:17 AM