CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 19(FIN) "An Act relating to pesticides and broadcast chemicals; and providing for an effective date." This was the second hearing for this bill in the Senate Finance Committee. Co-Chair Green asked the bill's sponsor to recap the nature of the question that arose during the Committee's first hearing on this bill. MIKE PAWLOWSKI, Staff to Representative Kevin Meyer, the bill's sponsor, stated that the question pertained to the Committee's perception that the March 18, 2005 Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC) $221,600 fiscal note #2 that accompanied the bill was incomplete. A new $221,600 DEC fiscal note, dated April 22, 2006 that explains how the amounts were determined has been provided. Co-Chair Green acknowledged. She understood that in the future, the number of pesticide registrations would change due to such things as attrition and users' decisions not to re-register products that were seldom utilized. Mr. Pawlowski affirmed that the fiscal note "assumes" there could be "up to a 40-percent drop rate in the State" of registered products. However, several chemical manufacturing companies argue that a significantly lower amount of pesticides would be un- registered than the amount projected by the Department. As a result of utilizing the Department's projections, "the level of receipt support services divided by the number of registered chemicals could lead to a lower fee on the manufacturers". Therefore, "the fiscal note is based on a worst-case scenario". Co-Chair Green ascertained therefore, that the State would fare better, revenue-wise, were its projections incorrect. 1:52:03 PM Co-Chair Green ordered the bill HELD in Committee. 1:53:08 PM