CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 23(JUD) "An Act relating to court-ordered restitution and compensation following a criminal conviction." This was the first hearing for this bill in the Senate Finance Committee. Co-chair Wilken explained that this bill pertains to restitution for crime victims and specifies that, "the court may value volunteer labor when considering restitution for crimes against a non-profit corporation." REPRESENTATIVE BRUCE WEYHRAUCH, the bill's sponsor, informed that this legislation was introduced in response to a Court of Appeals ruling that overturned an awarded restitution from a convicted defendant to a non-profit entity for volunteer labor that was required to audit the financial records of the organization. He shared that in this case, Demers v. State, 42 P.3d.1 (Alaska App.2002), the Court ruled that the Legislature did not intend for the affected legislative statutes to be read "so broadly" as to allow non-profits to recover this kind of a value. Furthermore, he disclosed, that while the Supreme Court did not rule on the case, two Supreme Court justices requested further interpretation regarding the restitution statute. Representative Weyhrauch pointed out that this bill would allow a non-profit, which is the victim of a crime, "to recover for the value of goods provided by volunteers if it was necessary to alleviate or mitigate the affects of the defendant's crime." He stressed that in order to gain support for this legislation from the Administration, the Court System, and other concerned entities, "the victim" in the bill is identified as the non-profit organization rather than the individual volunteers who provide labor to support the non-profit's position in the proceedings. Co-Chair Green asked for verification that this legislation would not allow such things as a special interest litigant "in any form to be the recipient of the good faith" award to a non-profit entity "that's been violated or offended." Representative Weyhrauch responded that, "there is absolutely no intent in this bill, in the criminal context, to provide that kind of benefit to any non-profit in any other form." He stated that this issue has been widely discussed "to ensure that that is not the intent whatsoever." Senator Taylor contended that this legislation is limited to criminal rather than civil activity. He expounded that "it should not be construed" that the Legislature intends "that similar actions that take place in a civil matter where a civil judgment might be brought, that as part of that judgment, a non-profit be applying for fees or costs incurred by volunteers in prosecuting their civil judgment." He stressed that the intent of this "narrowly drafted" legislation is to not affect anything other than criminal activity. Representative Weyhrauch concurred. Co-chair Wilken thanked the Committee for placing the clear intent of this legislation on the record. Senator Taylor moved to report the bill from Committee with individual recommendations and accompanying fiscal note. There being no objection, CS HB 23(JUD) was REPORTED from Committee with zero fiscal note #2 from the Department of Administration. AT EASE 10:31 AM / 10:32 AM