SENATE JOINT RESOLUTION NO. 38 Proposing amendments to the Constitution of the State of Alaska relating to information regarding proposed expenditures. This was the first hearing for this resolution in the Senate Finance Committee. Co-Chair Kelly noted this constitutional amendment allows the previous bill, HB 349, to be implemented. Representative Dyson relayed his experiences serving on the Anchorage Assembly where a similar prioritization process is in use. He noted this process was never codified in law, but is nonetheless effective and had been "greatly refined". Representative Dyson shared discussions on this legislation with Annalee McConnell, former leader of the budget department in the Municipality of Anchorage and current director of the state's Office of Management and Budget. He noted they talked about the process employed in the Municipality, whereby the budget analysts were required to calculate the "exact cost of every component of every output of every department." He relayed Ms. McConnell's concerns that these efforts were wasted for those programs that were of either very high priority, and would not be eliminated, or low priority and would not receive funding. He countered there is a benefit for the legislative body to know the cost of all operations regardless of whether those functions were considered for reductions. Senator Ward asked how the items in the Municipality of Anchorage budget are prioritized. Representative Dyson replied that the services and outputs are ranked from most valuable to least valuable by the departments. Senator Olson asked about transferring this method from a single municipality to the state, which has more complexity. Representative Dyson replied this principal is universal, is practiced by individuals and businesses, and is therefore reasonable to expect of the state. Representative Dyson noted the municipality system identifies those expenditures that are statutory required, those that are constitutionally mandated, and those that are supported by user fees. He suggested the state employ this method as well. These functions, he stressed, would become higher priorities. He stressed his intention is not to "take a sledgehammer or meat cleaver approach" but rather one that is thoughtful and rational. Senator Austerman asked what timeframe would be provided to the Administration to allow this prioritization process to be undertaken within the normal budget cycle. Co-Chair Kelly responded this constitutional amendment only allows the Legislature the authority to require the Administration to perform prioritization. He stated that statutes would be the appropriate venue to provide for an implementation timeframe. He anticipated statutory changes would be necessary to "refine the process". Senator Green offered a motion to report SJR 38 from Committee with a $1,500 fiscal note from the Office of the Governor, Division of Elections. The bill MOVED from Committee without objection.