CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 378(RLS) "An Act relating to the establishment of, assessment of, collection of, and accounting for service fees for state administration of workers' compensation and workers' safety programs; establishing civil penalties and sanctions for late payment or nonpayment of the service fee; and providing for an effective date." PAUL GROSSI, Director, Division of Workers' Compensation, Department of Labor and Workforce Development, clarified that the bill was designed to replace general funds that the Division of Workers' Compensation and worker safety programs within the Department have lost. The bill would create a dependable funding source paid equitably by all employers using the system. He reiterated that the purpose would be to provide a stable funding source to that Division. Mr. Grossi continued, the current system provides that employers that purchase workers' compensation insurance pay a tax or can become self-insured. The proposed legislation addresses that inequity. The new fee system would be designed to raise the same amount of money as the current tax. Because the new system would spread costs among more employers, those employers currently paying the premium tax would realize a decrease in their payments. He concluded that the bill would offer a fair, effective way of ensuring continued funding for vital worker protection programs. Co-Chair Torgerson noted that the bill would not be moved from Committee at this time, however, all testimony would be taken. ROBERT LOHR, Director, Division of Insurance, Department of Community & Economic Development, advised that the Division of Insurance recommends two technical amendments. The first change would revise the language so that the Division of Insurance would deposit a portion of the premium tax collected as opposed to the premium income reported. Otherwise, deposits may be required that would be greater than the amounts collected. Mr. Lohr continued, the bill does not contain the phrase "in lieu of all taxes…" as found on Page 2, Lines 25-28, of the previous version. He recommended that the provision amending AS 21.09.270 be removed. The change would maintain the long-standing statutory status quo regarding retaliatory fees. That would keep Alaska's retaliatory calculation in line with other states and would promote a level playing field between companies from this state and other states. Senator Phillips asked how it would differ from other states. Mr. Grossi replied that Alaska is one of the six states that actually funds the program through the general fund. The remaining states have some sort of "special" fund. Sixteen states have a fee-funding source. Senator Green asked if the excess money would be paying for the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). Mr. Grossi replied that it would be used to fund the safety programs and OSHA. Senator Green pointed out that the legislation was not necessarily intended to be used to improve workers' compensation but rather for funding OSHA. Senator Leman commented that the money would still be available for appropriation. Co-Chair Torgerson agreed that the Legislature would have the authority to decide on how those funds were being spent. He reiterated that those funds would be subject to appropriation. Co-Chair Torgerson noted that HB 378 would be HELD in Committee for further consideration.