SENATE BILL NO. 257 "An Act relating to notice requirements for certain final findings concerning the disposal of an interest in state land or resources for oil and gas; relating to administrative appeals and petitions for reconsideration of decisions of the Department of Natural Resources; and providing for an effective date." BOB LOEFFLER, Director, Division of Mining, Land and Water, Department of Natural Resources, explained the bill does two things, creates a uniform appeals process for the Department of Natural Resources and corrects a notice problem for the Division of Oil and Gas. Mr. Loeffler explained the problems that precipitated this bill. He stated that for a variety of reasons, different laws have been passed over several years, and because of the way they interact, there is a variety of appeals processes within the department. He noted that these different processes follow different schedules with 15 - 30 days allowed to file an appeal. The different processes, he added require different channels and opportunities for appeals. He remarked that this causes confusion for the public and for department staff. He stated that this bill establishes there is only one appeal process, one appeal to the commissioner and the next appeal made in court. Mr. Loeffler continued with the second problem relating to notices for lease sales stating that there are currently three notices. He detailed these notices. As a result, he said the public is confused and there is additional cost for publishing the multiple notices. Co-Chair Torgerson asked why this bill does not have a negative fiscal note. Mr. Loeffler responded that the Division of Oil and Gas has a higher workload this year, and the intent is to use the small cost savings from this legislation to pay for the other operations. The savings anticipated by other divisions, he said are spread between many employees and would be difficult to identify. He stated that because the department had a $750,000 budget reduction, "we're just struggling to keep up." Co-Chair Torgerson asked if the fiscal note therefore has nothing to do with the bill but rather with the department's desire to save money to be spent elsewhere within the department. Mr. Loeffler repeated that the savings would be difficult to calculate. Senator Leman asked how much the department spends annually on public notices. Mr. Loeffler did not know the entire cost but knew that the intermediate notice is a few thousand dollars for each oil and gas lease sale. He noted that the department offers "a few" of these sales each year. Senator Leman was interested in reducing costs and stated that if this bill could allow the department to save money, he supported it. He suggested a conceptual amendment to remove the appeals process from the bill and maintain only the public notice portion. Co-Chair Torgerson wanted the amendment offered on the Senate floor. Co-Chair Parnell pointed out that the Committee has in its possession, another bill that contains this language. Co-Chair Parnell offered a motion to report from Committee, SB 257, 1-GS2046.A with accompanying zero fiscal note from the Department of Natural Resources. Without objection, the bill MOVED from Committee.