HOUSE BILL NO. 12 "An Act relating to an easement for the extension of the Alaska Railroad to the Alaska-Canada border." SPONSOR SUBSTITUTE FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 12 "An Act relating to a utility corridor and railroad right-of-way between the Alaska Railroad and the Alaska-Canada border." CS FOR SPONSOR SUBSTITUTE FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 12(FIN) "An Act relating to a utility corridor and railroad right-of-way between the Alaska Railroad and the Alaska-Canada border." CS FOR SPONSOR SUBSTITUTE FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 12(FIN) am "An Act relating to a utility corridor and railroad right-of-way between the Alaska Railroad and the Alaska-Canada border." Representative JEANNETTE JAMES was invited to join the committee. She explained HB 12 and explained her sponsor statement. (Arrival of Senator Donley noted at approximately 10:14 a.m.) Representative James continued her statement before the committee. She explained the outline of the corridor. It was a very simple matter. She said advantages to Alaska were obvious: resource development, tourism, job opportunities for all areas of Alaska, with controlled access and without the expensive maintenance problems of other modes of transportation. In response to a question from Senator Leman she said there should be no fiscal note. FRANK MIELKE, Chief of Right-of-Way, Department of Transportation was invited to join the committee. He explained why the route was chosen. It was a matter of putting it on the Department of Natural Resources records. It will be noted that this procedure was not under the normal statutes. Co-chair Torgerson said the right-of-way was not to be less than five feet. Was this correct? Mr. Mielke said this right-of-way allotment was proper in this particular case. It was a typical practice to have an extra wide right-of- way and then taper it down. Senator Adams referred to some costs that may arise in the future. Mr. Mielke said regardless of who actually does the work or spends the money the funding would come through the railroad. Senator Adams asked if this was stated anywhere in the bill? Mr. Mielke said "no". Representative James explained to the committee that the bill notes "other interested parties". Senator Parnell MOVED HB 12 and WITHOUT OBJECTION it was reported out with individual recommendations and accompanying fiscal notes; Department of Transportation and Public Facilities, zero and the Department of Natural Resources, zero. Co-chair Torgerson called SB 88.