HOUSE BILL 313 "An Act relating to preventive maintenance programs required for certain state grants; and providing for an effective date." SENATOR GARY WILKEN informed the committee that he had served on the preventative maintenance task force during the summer and fall before the legislative session. The task force had traveled around the state and listened to people; it became evident that there was an opportunity provided by technology and collected knowledge that could allow preventative maintenance to be put in place for a minimal amount of money. He argued that the preventative maintenance programs were important and were lacking in many different areas. He noted that HB 313 would require that school districts, Regional Education Attendance Areas (REAAs), and municipalities would have preventative maintenance programs in place before being given money through state grants. Senator Parnell asked why there was a delayed effective date. DANNY DEWITT, DIRECTOR, NATIONAL FEDERATION OF INDEPENDENT BUSINESSES, ALASKA CHAPTER, replied that there had been discussions (primarily with the Department of Education); there was a concern that the short time-frame between the present time and July 1, 1998 would not be enough time for a number of entities to get a preventative maintenance program in place. The House State Affairs Committee had elected to delay one year so that entities could have enough time to proceed without too much disruption. Senator Torgerson summarized that the bill would require that funds be withheld until a preventative maintenance plan was in place that included a computerized maintenance management program. He agreed with the idea. He questioned the impact to municipalities and REAAs in terms of financial output. Senator Wilken responded that many had had the same question until Roger Patch gave a presentation in Anchorage. Mr. Patch described what he had done in the Department of Military and Veterans Affairs, and had suggested that a municipality or agency could put a qualifying preventative maintenance system in place for $10,000, given current technology. He did not think the process would be a burden. Mr. DeWitt directed attention to a written description of a program to track maintenance. He encouraged the use of a computerized system with built-in reminders of what needed to be done and when. He referred to different levels of systems that could give most agencies an easy opportunity to comply with the law. Senator Torgerson was concerned about smaller REAAs, since the smallest had only 21 people. He noted that the fiscal note included a request for an assistant architect to evaluate and conduct the systems. He questioned why the department did not just track maintenance on a centralized and consolidated basis for smaller REAAs. Mr. DeWitt thought the option would be available for smaller districts, but the district would have to have the plan. There was not a requirement to create a new department in any given operation. Senator Torgerson MOVED to REPORT CSHB 313(FIN) out of committee with individual recommendations and attached fiscal notes. There being no OBJECTION, it was so ordered. CSHB 313(FIN) was REPORTED out of committee with a "do pass" recommendation and attached fiscal and zero fiscal notes by the Department of Education.