SENATE BILL NO. 240 "An Act repealing the tax on punchboards and coin- operated amusement and gaming devices; and providing for an effective date." Bob Bartholomew, Deputy Director of the Division of Income and Excise Audit, Department of Revenue, was invited to the table to testify in support of this bill. He gave a brief history of events that lead to this request. The original tax was imposed by the Territorial Legislature in 1947. Mr. Bartholomew said he has been unable to find documentation to show the reasoning behind this original action. While the tax rate was in increased in 1987, since that time, the department costs of administering the program have risen and can no longer be justified by the small amount of earnings brought in. The department is trying to maintain a high level of service on a continually decreasing amount of operating funds. This program requires approximately 500 man-hours a year to administer and brings in less than $30,000 annually. Mr. Bartholomew said his office feels their efforts could be better spent on enforcement of other programs that generate higher revenues. He explained that although revenue from this tax is distributed between municipalities and the state, the municipalities have given their support for repealing this tax. Their reasons are the same as the departments: focusing resources on collection of other tax programs, with higher revenue, is more fiscally advantageous. Mr. Bartholomew answered a question from Senator Torgerson saying that repealing this tax will have no affect on a municipality's authority to regulate businesses. Senator Donley noted this bill did not address vending machines and asked if they were taxed. Mr. Bartholomew told him that other than cigarette machines, he was unaware of any other vending machine taxes. Senator Adams pointed out that the changes proposed in SB 240 would affect 14 statutes. He wondered if the legislature would be required to address video machines and pulltabs. Mr. Bartholomew anticipated the need for completely new regulations to govern gaming machines. Co- Chair Pearce shared that it is normal for states to collect a percentage of the income generated by these machines rather than impose a straight tax on their presence. There was more discussion on the division's intent to focus the savings into the Compliance Group if this measure passed. This group was formed within the Department to work to bring taxable parties into compliance with the law. Senator Adams moved SB 240 out of committee and without objection, and with an updated zero fiscal note from Department of Revenue, Division of Income and Excise Audit, it was reported out.