CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 456(L&C) "An Act relating to the Board of Storage Tank Assistance; and providing for an effective date." George Dozier, staff aide to Representative Kott testified on behalf of the bill. He said this bill was due to sunset this year. Legislative audit recommended the board be extended and that a public member be added to the board. This bill would also take care of those recommendations. John Barnett, executive director, storage tank assistance, DEC was invited to join the committee. He reviewed the legislative history. He explained the amendment co-chairman Halford requested be drafted. The current storage tank assistance program does not limit eligibility for financial assistance. If one has a regulated tank and pays a registration fee, they are able to receive financial assistance without regard to financial need. The board has worked up criteria related to rural locations, number of facilities owned by the oeprator and some other criteria. It will retain the public health threat criteria as the greatest emphasis to be put on sites; and also the inability to demonstrate the financial responsibility requirements as set out by the Federal Government. The financial responsibility requirements require pollution liability insurance or self insurability. Mr. Barnett said the federal government defined small companies through financial responsibility as twelve tanks or less. This would be consistent with the federal requirements. The failure of a tank owner to meet financial responsibility under federal law is a fine of $10,000/day. He said sites would be ranked with six tanks or less with higher points than twelve tanks or less because it is a set criteria the board could consider in ranking. Co-chairman Halford said he felt smaller entities should have a higher priority. Mr. Barnett said the Alaska Underground Tank Owners and Operators supported ten tanks; the department made the suggestion of twelve. He was sure there would be no objection if the committee wanted to initially reduce it to ten on this amendment. Twelve was considered consistent with federal rules. Co-chairman Halford said he has opposed this bill in the past because there are four elements: testing, clean-up, closure and granting individuals money to purchase new tanks. At some point the spill should not be rewarded. The upgrade portion is the one that has the most opposition. Senators Phillips and Sharp moved amendment #1 regarding tank cleanup program. Mr. Dozier said the sponsor would have no objection to the amendment. Without objection the amendment was adopted. Senator Phillips moved SCS CSHB 456(FIN) and without objection it was reported out with individual recommendations and zero fiscal note from Department of Environmental Conservation. ADJOURNMENT Senator Halford recessed at 12:24 P.M. subject to call of the chair.