SB 246 REIMBURSABLE SERVICE AGREEMENTS Co-chair Pearce directed that SB 246 be brought on for discussion. NANCY SLAGLE, Director of Budget Review, Office of Management and Budget, came before committee to present an amendment. Senator Randy Phillips sought concurrence in the amendment from the Legislative Auditor and Director of Legislative Finance. Mrs. Slagle explained that the first provision of the amendment removes redundant language prohibiting use of RSAs to merely transfer money between appropriations. That prohibition is covered in the previous sentence of the legislation. (Senator Rieger arrived at this time.) The second change within the amendment eliminates subsection (2) wording requiring that the agency that provides the service have authority, by law, to do so. The change would provide flexibility in areas where an agency provides certain expertise but may not have specific statutory authority. Mrs. Slagle said that the remainder of the amendment simply provides a better flow of bill language. She then directed attention to subsection (2)(A) of the amendment and noted need to correct a typographical error by replacing "of" with "to." RANDY WELKER, Legislative Auditor, came before committee in response to questions from Senator Kerttula. Mr. Welker explained that the bill attempts to curtail past RSA abuses highlighted by an audit of the Dept. of Health and Social Services. Statutory clarification is needed concerning allowable uses of reimbursable service agreements. An RSA should only provide reimbursement for a service. The bill attempts to cut off potential transfer of funds between appropriations under the guise of an RSA. There is presently no statutory language that addresses these agreements. The proposed bill would "put some . . . direction in statute." Responding to an earlier question from Senator Phillips, Mr. Welker said that amendment language proposed by OMB poses no significant problem. Legal authority language proposed for removal is an inherent requirement for use of an RSA. MIKE GREANY, Director, Legislative Finance Division, concurred in comments by Mr. Welker that the proposed amendment would present no problem. Mr. Greany next noted that when the bill was previously before committee, questions were raised concerning legislative ability to continue to make necessary transfers within the annual budget document. Subsequent review has not evidenced problems in that area. Senator Rieger commented regarding subsection (2)(B) language relating to cost allocation methods and asked if it provides a loophole. Mr. Welker acknowledged the concern, but questioned whether there was any way to totally preclude intentional circumvention. It will be incumbent upon OMB to critically review proposed cost allocation plans to ensure that they have a rational basis in cost. Bill language identifies and places responsibility for approval of the plan with OMB. Senator Frank MOVED for adoption of amendment no. 1. No objection having been raised, amendment no. 1 was ADOPTED. Co-chair Pearce noted that the title of the legislation appears to be broad. Senator Rieger concurred in need to limit the title to reimbursable service agreements. Senator Kelly MOVED to tighten and clarify the title. No objection having been raised, amendment no. 2, to restrict the title, was ADOPTED. Co-chair Frank MOVED that CSSB 246 (Fin), incorporating amendment no. 1 and the conceptual title change of amendment no. 2, pass from committee with individual recommendations and the accompanying zero fiscal note. No objection having been raised, CSSB 246 (Fin) was REPORTED OUT of committee with a unanimous "do pass" recommendation, new title, (An Act permitting the use of reimbursable service agreements and other agreements between state agencies to finance the provision of services if the agency that requires the service has the authority to obtain or provide the service and has an appropriation that may be used for that purpose and if the agency that provides the service bills the agency administering the funds available for that service based on the actual cost to provide the service or a cost allocation method approved by the office of management and budget) and zero fiscal note from the Office of Management and Budget.