CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 64(FIN) An Act creating the crimes of stalking in the first and second degrees and providing penalties for their violation; providing a peace officer with the authority to arrest without a warrant a person the peace officer has reasonable cause to believe has committed stalking; relating to the release before trial of a person accused of stalking; prohibiting the suspension of imposition of sentence of a person convicted of stalking; relating to the crime of assault in the third degree; and providing for an effective date. Co-chair Pearce directed that CSHB 64 (Fin) be brought on for discussion and referenced SCS CSHB 64 (STA). REPRESENTATIVE CYNTHIA TOOHEY came before committee in support of the bill. She attested to much publicity in 1989 surrounding the stalking death of actress Rebecca Schaeffer by an obsessed fan. The following year, four California women were murdered by stalkers. In those cases the victims had been stalked and threatened and had obtained temporary restraining orders against their assailants. California reacted by passing the first anti-stalking law. Thirty-two states have passed similar laws, and legislation is pending in fifteen others. That action is the result of victim frustration with current law enforcement inability to intervene prior to a physical attack upon the victim. FBI reports indicate that, in 1990, 30% of female murder victims were slain by husbands or boyfriends. Approximately 90% had called the police at least once seeking protection, and more than half had called five times or more. Representative Toohey noted that Alaska is not free of stalkers. She then directed attention to backup material containing narrative accounts of stalking incidents in Anchorage. The proposed bill is modeled after Michigan law passed in December of 1992. Legislative staff worked closely with the Dept. of Law, Dept. of Public Safety, Council on Domestic Violence and Sexual Assault, law enforcement agencies, and constituents to develop the legislation now before committee. The legislation unanimously passed House committees of referral and the House of Representatives. It is accompanied by five zero fiscal notes. MARGOT KNUTH, Assistant Attorney General, Criminal Division, Dept. of Law, came before committee in response to a question from Senator Rieger concerning a proposed amendment. She explained that affirmative defense provisions were added to the bill (page 2, lines 23-27) when it was before Senate State Affairs. The affirmative defense recognizes that an individual cannot be prosecuted for exercising his or her constitutional rights. That is true with stalking as with any other criminal law in Alaska. The proposed amendment would add the following at page 2, line 27: After "section" add: Whether an act of the defendant is a constitutionally protected activity is a question of law to be determined by the court before* trial. The foregoing language is patterned after AS 11.76.110(b) which relates to interference with constitutional rights. The Dept. of Law is requesting that the amendment be incorporated so the bill is clear and consistent with existing statutes. Senator Rieger suggested that use of "prior to trial" rather than "before trial" would be more appropriate. Ms. Knuth concurred. *Senator Rieger MOVED for adoption of the proposed amendment, substituting "prior to" for "before." Co-chair Pearce called for a show of hands on the motion. The motion CARRIED on a unanimous vote of the 5 members in attendance, and the amendment was ADOPTED. Co-chair Pearce called for additional questions or comments. None were forthcoming. Senator Jacko MOVED that SCS CSHB 64 (Fin) pass from committee with individual recommendations. No objection having been raised, SCS CSHB 64 (Fin) was REPORTED OUT of committee with zero fiscal notes from the Dept. of Law, Dept. of Corrections, Dept. of Public Safety, and Dept. of Administration. All members present signed the committee report with a "do pass" recommendation. (Co-chair Frank and Senator Kerttula were not present and did not sign.)