HCR 27-LOCAL BOUNDARY COMMISSION PROCEDURES    REPRESENTATIVE DREW SCALZI, bill sponsor, introduced the legislation by stating the following: The Local Boundary Commission (LBC) is charged with the review of petitions seeking local boundary changes, approval or denial of those petitions as submitted or as the LBC sees fit to modify them. What happened recently in my area is that the City of Homer asked for an annexation petition that was very excessive as to what was finally ratified and agreed to by the LBC. In asking for 25 square miles of new property, they were essentially more than doubling the size of the community. They felt that it was up to the LBC to make that determination. The LBC did so after two years of very tense and contentious public testimony. Having been involved in that, my attitude was I'm glad we had a third independent party, which was the LBC, to make that decision. However, it did drag a lot of people through an unnecessary process when this was excessive in nature. The City of Homer finally was satisfied with a 4.5 mile are that the LBC had modified it down to. What this resolution asks is that the LBC adopt new regulations that would allow them, early in the process, to remit a petition that is significantly deficient. If it was too excessive they could have a hearing and they could find it was way out of line or if it was too small and they would be able to send it back to the city and say, do your homework again, we're not going to do it for you. Nor are we going to drag the public through an arduous process. He said the LBC is in support of the resolution. CHAIRMAN TORGERSON called for testimony. ABIGAIL FULLER testified in support of HCR 27. Although it doesn't address all the concerns she has about the process of changing boundaries, the LBC does need to be able to reject petitions out of hand and send them back for revision when there clearly is a problem. "This bill is a small step in the right direction." VI JERRELL, PhD. testified in support of HCR 27, which urges the LBC to adopt standards and procedures to enable them to return a petition when they determine the petition is substantially deficient or in need of substantial supplementation. PETE ROBERTS, President of the Citizens Concerned About Annexation, testified in support of HCR 27. He believes that: · Cities shouldn't be able to select the manner in which an annexation is held. That decision should be made by the LBC. · Major hearings should be held mid way through the process so what is said at the hearing can have some affect on the process. · The LBC should set the regulations to use due process CHAIRMAN TORGERSON agreed with the testifiers, it is a small step, but this is a start in the right direction. There was no further testimony. He asked for the will of the committee. SENATOR AUSTERMAN made a motion to move HCR 27 and attached fiscal note from committee with individual recommendations. There being no objection, it was so ordered.