HB 289-MUNICIPAL MANAGER PLAN    REPRESENTATIVE GARY STEVENS, bill sponsor, described the legislation as a clean up of state regulations. It is to make it clear to the voter to what position they are electing someone and to make it clear to the candidates the position for which they are running. It can be confusing when there is an election to change the form of a municipal government at the same time that a mayor is being elected. Voters are not sure whether they are electing a strong mayor or a ceremonial mayor and the mayoral candidates wouldn't know to which type of position they might be elected. The bill adds a year in between the change of government so, if the people vote to change the form of government, the mayor would remain in that office under the old form for one year. CHAIRMAN TORGERSON asked whether municipalities could, through ordinance, decide on the effective date of the switch. REPRESENTATIVE STEVENS thought the community could do that. CHAIRMAN TORGERSON said it looked as though the bill wouldn't allow communities to do that. REPRESENTATIVE STEVENS said that wasn't the option that was offered to the public in elections he was involved in. CHAIRMAN TORGERSON said he hadn't seen it offered either it was just a question. SENATOR PHILLIPS asked for the genesis of the bill. REPRESENTATIVE STEVENS said in Kodiak they were in the process of changing their form of government from a ceremonial mayor to strong mayor and voting for the mayor at the same time. It's an unfair position for the candidate because a strong mayor position is a full time job while the ceremonial mayor position is not. All mayoral candidates aren't necessarily looking for a full time job. There was no further testimony. SENATOR PHILLIPS made a motion to move SSHB 289 am and attached fiscal note from committee with individual recommendations. There being no objection, it was so ordered.