HB 542 BOARD OF FISH VOTING ETHICS  SENATOR TORGERSON introduced CSHB 542(FSH) as the next order of business. Number 465 REPRESENTATIVE ALAN AUSTERMAN, prime sponsor of HB 542, said he introduced the legislation after a February meeting of past members and the current chairman of the Board of Fisheries. The main issue that came out of the two-day meeting was that there was a problem with the conflict of interest in the Board of Fisheries and how it was being handled. People were being conflicted off of the board, decisions were not being made in some instances, and decisions were being swayed in other instances because of the people being conflicted off of the board. Representative Austerman said HB 542 removes the attorney general out of the picture, in that he does not give opinions any more about the Board of Fisheries conflict of interest. The bill also mandates that board members will discuss and vote on all issues after declaring a conflict of interest. Board members will also have to file a financial conflict of interest statement with the APOC. Representative Austerman said the basis of the legislation is to get the Board of Fisheries back on track and have them make decisions based upon the issues rather than being conflicted off. Number 530 SENATOR ZHAROFF moved that an immediate effective date be added to the legislation. Hearing no objection, the Chairman stated the motion carried. Number 557 STEVEN WHITE, Department of Law, stated the department has no position on HB 542. He related that for the past six years he has advised the Board of Fisheries and has helped them through implementing the current Executive Ethics Act. He noted that if HB 542 passes, it will be the first time that any agency will be exempted from the conflict of interest provisions of that Act. TAPE 96-20, SIDE B Number 001 Mr. White discussed and answered questions on the current process for determining if board members have a conflict of interest. He emphasized the department does not make the decisions for the board; they help them work through the issues, but the board itself makes the final determination. In his closing comments, Mr. White said he understands that former board chairmen don't like the Ethics Act and it's somewhat understandable because it does add more to the board process. However, under the current process, the lay character of the board is preserved because the members who do have experience are allowed to share that experience with the board; they're just not permitted to vote or to persuade other persons. He also said the department believes in the board process and the integrity of the board process, and they don't want to see anything that would lead the public to lose its confidence that there's total impartiality on the board when they make their decisions. Number 130 There being no further testimony on HB 542, SENATOR TORGERSON asked for the will of the committee. SENATOR ZHAROFF moved SCS CSHB 542(CRA) pass out of committee with individual recommendations. Hearing no objection, it was so ordered.