Number 120 CSHB 386(JUD) CRUELTY TO ANIMALS  SENATOR TORGERSON brought CSHB 386(JUD) before the committee as the final order of business. REPRESENTATIVE BEN GRUSSENDORF , prime sponsor of the legislation, said a problem was brought to his attention relating to the treatment of animals, and the bill was introduced in response to concerns expressed by constituents regarding the difficulty of prosecuting cases which involve cruelty to animals. Representative Grussendorf explained the bill doesn't change what can legally be done right now or what is illegal to do. It simply changes some standards and allows the borough to adopt an ordinance to prohibit cruelty to animals. The main change in Section 1 is changing "intentionally" to "knowingly" which lowers the state of mind the state must prove in prosecuting a case. This would help in cases of starving animals. An owner's actions may not have been intentional, but a reasonable person would "know" that a lack of food results in a starving animal. It also lowers the criminal standard by changing "recklessly" to "with criminal negligence," which would mean gross deviation from a standard of care that a reasonable person would observe. Section 2 gives the boroughs the authority to adopt an ordinance. Number 180 BILL WARD , testifying from the Kenai LIO, stated he has an agricultural operation on the Kenai Peninsula, and his concern is with turning some of this responsibility over to borough staff people who may not be qualified to interpret what is proper care of agricultural animals. Right now, the state veterinarian's office and the Division of Agriculture hold that responsibility, and he believes they are qualified and should remain the oversight on proper care of agricultural animals. He agrees with the original intent of the legislation to take care of pets and other companion animals where people may not be in the professional business of raising livestock. Number 428 SENATOR TORGERSON related that amendments have been drafted that will address Mr. Ward's concern. Representative Grussendorf explained one of the amendments fortifies accepted veterinarian practice by adding "animal husbandry," but he assured Mr. Ward that the proposed legislation would not affect any of his current practices. SENATOR TORGERSON stated because the committee lacked a quorum, the bill and proposed amendments would be held over until the next meeting of the committee.