SENATOR GEORGE JACKO, prime sponsor of SB 42, explained that the legislation will provide local municipalities the ability to tax above the level of other commodities subject to sales tax. Local voters would have to approve the measure before implementation could take place. If approved, it would be up to the local governments to decide how they want to spend the revenues generated from the increased tax. Senator Jacko said he views the legislation as creating another revenue tool for local governments to increase revenues. Not all communities may decide to utilize the higher alcohol beverage sales tax, but it would be available to those who decide it is needed. Senator Jacko noted that many communities in his district are supportive of the legislation. Number 050 KENT SWISHER, Executive Director, Alaska Municipal League, voiced their support for SB 42. He agreed the legislation would be another revenue source for local governments, especially in the smaller communities. Mr. Swisher suggested the bill might be amended to create the ability to impose a tax on this particular product whether or not there is a sales tax on other items. Number 080 PAUL DICK, Income & Excise Audit Division, Department of Revenue, stated he was present to respond to questions. Number 085 LENNIE GORSUCH, representing the Miller Brewing Co., stated the company's opposition to SB 42, which she said would allow municipalities to isolate one industry and one commodity to tax disproportionately. Ms. Gorsuch said that the majority of beer drinkers enjoy the beverage responsibly. Most beer drinkers in the U.S. and Alaska are low to middle income citizens, and taxing them at a higher rate would decrease the amount of discretionary funding that they would have available for other purchases. Ms. Gorsuch reiterated the Miller Brewing Company's opposition to SB 42, saying they do not believe it is good public policy to isolate just this one industry for taxation. Number 115 RICK URION, representing the Alaska Wine & Spirits Wholesalers Association, stated their opposition to SB 42, which, in essence, would repeal the law that the legislature passed in 1985. He noted that law has been challenged, taken to the State Supreme Court and upheld. Mr. Urion said the issue is one of equity. Alcohol should be taxed at the same rate that anything else is taxed. There being no further witnesses present to testify on SB 42, CHAIRMAN RANDY PHILLIPS stated it would be held until there was a quorum present.