HB 128-OIL TERMINAL FACILITY  1:20:09 PM CHAIR MCCABE announced that the first order of business would be HOUSE BILL NO. 128, "An Act relating to the definition of 'oil terminal facility.'" 1:20:59 PM REPRESENTATIVE VANCE moved to adopt the proposed committee substitute (CS) for HB 128, Version 33-LS0634\U, Gunther/Radford, 4/20/23, as a working document. REPRESENTATIVE MCCABE objected for the purpose of discussion. He asked Buddy Whitt to address the changes proposed in the CS. 1:21:21 PM BUDDY WHITT, Staff, Representative Kevin McCabe, Alaska State Legislature, explained the changes in the proposed CS for HB 128, Version U, on behalf of the sponsor, the House Transportation Standing Committee, on which Representative McCabe serves as chair. He reviewed that the original bill contained a definition of "oil terminal facility" that included two instances where a vessel would be considered an oil tank facility, and this caused concerns among fuel handlers in the state. He stated that Version U was drafted based on feedback from stakeholders, but said he is currently awaiting feedback from the Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC). MR. WHITT paraphrased the sectional analysis for Version U [included in the committee packet], which read as follows [original punctuation provided]: Section 1 Page 1, lines 4 through 11 adds language that an approved contingency plan for a tank vessel or oil barge satisfies the requirement in (a) of this section for contingency plans for oil terminal facilities. Section 2 Page 1, line 12 through Page 2, line 6 adds language that proof of financial ability for a tank or oil barge that is approved under this subsection satisfies the requirements of (a) of the section for proof of financial ability for oil terminal facilities. Section 3 Page 2, lines 12 through 26 changes the definition of oil terminal facility to confirm to the additions of sections one and two; specifying that when a tank vessel or oil barge are operating with approved contingency plans and proof of financial ability, they are not considered "oil terminal facilities". Section 4 Page 2, line 27 Added an immediate effective date to the bill. 1:25:22 PM CHAIR MCCABE removed his objection to the motion to adopt the proposed CS for HB 128, Version U. There being no further objection, Version U was before the committee. CHAIR MCCABE announced that HB 128 was held over.