HB 253-SALE, TRANSFER, OR DISPOSAL OF FERRIES  1:13:29 PM CHAIR STUTES announced that the final order of business would be HOUSE BILL NO. 253, "An Act relating to the powers of the Department of Transportation and Public Facilities; and relating to the sale, transfer, or disposal of state ferries." 1:14:37 PM REPRESENTATIVE JONATHAN KREISS-TOMKINS, Alaska State Legislature, as prime sponsor, introduced HB 253, a three-line bill which would ask for approval from the legislature before disposal of assets of the Alaska Marine Highway System (AMHS). He added that HB 253 is in response to frustration in Coastal Alaska over the state of the AMHS. Even with more [AMHS] structure and funding, Representative Kreiss-Tompkins imparted, if core assets were "rashly" disposed of, then there would no longer exist a system to put back together. 1:16:22 PM CHAIR STUTES added that she would like to amend HB 253 to say that if any AMHS assets were sold, then the funds would go back into the AMHS. 1:17:09 PM REPRESENTATIVE CLAMAN asked how HB 253 would deal with the legislature's lack of fast action when it may be needed. 1:18:00 PM REPRESENTATIVE KREISS-TOMKINS replied to Representative Stutes that he thought there was a lot of logic in putting proceeds from asset sales back into the AMHS fund. Addressing Representative Claman, he said he saw that lack of fast action as analogous to the court system where individual legislation is required to add specific judgeships: it would be an administrative change and yet it would be a modification of statute; similarly to the legislative/judicial branch interaction, it seems functional that there would be an interaction between the executive branch and the legislative branch in terms of vessel sales. REPRESENTATIVE KREISS-TOMKINS added that the underlying motivation behind HB 253 is one of defense. Alaskans wish to prevent the AMHS from becoming dismantled, to protect assets, and to ensure that rash decisions are not being made. He went on to say that there is currently no check on mainline ferries, the main assets of the AMHS, from being eliminated. Furthermore, he admitted that if the AMHS did move to the public corporation model and it did have independent governance of the system, then HB 253 may become moot. Since the AMHS is currently not operating under the public corporation model, however, and there is currently real existential concern about the AMHS, HB 253 is a defensive reaction. 1:20:54 PM REPRESENTATIVE CLAMAN said he could see how HB 253 does speak to the lack of long-term planning. It would be one thing, he added, if there were a decision made over the course of a year that determined a fast ferry should be sold, and quite another to suddenly decide to sell one of the fast ferries within a month if it were not being used. One scenario suggested planning and time to coordinate with the legislature while another suggested a decision that may not be made with any kind of in-depth analysis, Representative Claman surmised; HB 253 would facilitate the former and hinder the latter. 1:22:00 PM REPRESENTATIVE KREISS-TOMKINS said that he agreed with Representative Claman regarding the fast ferries not coming back, at least in the foreseeable future. The main idea behind HB 253 was making sure the mainliner vessels, which are the fleet's core assets, were protected and not eliminated. 1:23:45 PM REPRESENTATIVE DRUMMOND asked whether the M/V Chenega and the M/V Fairweather could return to service or whether it had been decided that they were too expensive to operate. She also mentioned that the M/V Tazlina and the M/V Hubbard had long been problematic but the former two could have been "pinch hitting" during this time when no ships were in operation. Representative Drummond disagreed that the M/V Chenega and the M/V Fairweather should be eliminated from the impact of HB 253 as it is currently written. 1:25:52 PM REPRESENTATIVE KREISS-TOMKINS said that he would defer to the will of the committee and stakeholders, and if they did not object, then he did not object either. 1:26:50 PM REPRESENTATIVE STORY asked Representative Kreiss-Tompkins to refresh her memory on how the M/V Taku was handled, as she had heard from constituents that its removal had been hasty. 1:27:15 PM REPRESENTATIVE KREISS-TOMKINS answered that he thought the Department of Transportation & Public Facilities (DOTPF) had been in contact with an outfit in Portland, Oregon, who had expressed interest in buying it for use as an attraction on the waterfront, but that fell through, and ultimately the vessel was sold for only "$100,000 or $200,000" to a shipwrecking yard in Bangladesh or India. He added that the low price point of the M/V Taku sale was indicative of there being no market for the ships. 1:29:22 PM MATT MCLAREN, Business Development Manager, Alaska Marine Highway System, Department of Transportation & Public Facilities, informed the committee that the M/V Taku had sold for $172,000. 1:29:50 PM REPRESENTATIVE STORY repeated that some of her constituents felt there had not been an adequate public process regarding the M/V Taku and she had been wondering about the legislative and public input stages. 1:30:08 PM MR. MCLAREN said that the first step had been to see if there were any other public entities in Alaska or in the U.S. that were interested in the vessel's purchase. Mr. McLaren said he was unaware of public process as far as input. In response to a follow-up question, he confirmed he was not aware of any process or approval that went through the legislature. 1:31:20 PM MIKE LESMANN Legislative Liaison, Department of Transportation & Public Facilities, recalled going to Ketchikan for a public meeting on the M/V Taku and seeing Representative Ortiz and community members in the room. 1:32:21 PM REPRESENTATIVE STORY asked whether the Alaska Railroad Corporation is required to go through the legislature if it is going to dispose of any assets. 1:32:40 PM REPRESENTATIVE TALERICO said that he believed legislative approval was required. 1:32:58 PM CHAIR STUTES announced that HB 253 would be held over.