SJR 25-FLOODING AND EROSION CONTROL ASSISTANCE [Contains discussion of HB 327.] Number 1040 CHAIR WEYHRAUCH announced that the next order of business was SENATE JOINT RESOLUTION NO. 25, Recommending that certain federal funding restrictions be eased so that more villages in Alaska would qualify for assistance relating to flooding and erosion. Number 0059 HAVEN HARRIS, Staff to Senator Donny Olson, Alaska State Legislature, on behalf of Senator Olson, sponsor, read the sponsor statement, as follows: Senate Joint Resolution 25 is a resolution requesting the Army Corp of Engineers ease their cost benefit analysis for projects in rural Alaska. Senator Olson has proposed this resolution in response to many concerns voiced by my constituents with regards to the erosion and flooding problems that plague Western Alaska. Currently, many of the villages in Western Alaska are not receiving the assistance needed for the protection of life and property. On November 8, 2003, a winter storm hit western Alaska. This storm caused considerable damage to Unalakleet, Shishmaref, and some of Nome's surrounding areas. While the governor has declared a state of disaster because of this storm, the continued effect[s] of erosion on the villages of Alaska are not going to be solved by emergency disaster declarations. A more comprehensive, coordinated effort is required by the Army Corps of Engineers and other federal and state agencies. Senator Olson and our office respectfully urge your support for this resolution to focus attention on this serious problem. MR. HARRIS noted that although the sponsor statement talks about erosion in Western Alaska, it is a serious problem in other parts of the state, as well; therefore, the "BE IT RESOLVED" section of the resolution [on page 2, lines 14-18] includes all communities in the state. Number 0194 REPRESENTATIVE HOLM, for the record, characterized HB 327 as a companion bill to SJR 25, because it also deals with cost benefits analyses that [are not economically feasible]. He expressed his appreciation for SJR 25 and said he hopes it can be supported. Number 0265 REPRESENTATIVE SEATON, [in regard to the section of the bill addressing sending "COPIES" of the resolution, on page 2, lines 19-26], suggested that the copies be sent by electronic transmission to avoid possible problems of sending them by mail. Number 0306 REPRESENTATIVE SEATON moved to report SJR 25 out of committee with individual recommendations [and the accompanying fiscal notes]. There being no objection, SJR 25 was reported out of the House State Affairs Standing Committee.