HSTA - 02/28/95 HB 173 - AN ACT RELATING TO REPORTS BY STATE AGENCIES Number 024 REPRESENTATIVE GARY DAVIS came before the committee to present HB 173, with fiscal notes, which he passed to committee members. He stated that it is a simple bill, and he thinks it is a better way. Currently, every bill and every statute that comes before the legislature says that each agency, committee, or commission, or department, will provide a copy of their annual report to the governor and legislature. So, that is what they do. Representative Davis thought it would be appropriate to notify the legislature that a report is available, which will provide a reduction in the material that flows through a legislator's office. Currently, state agencies are required by statute to prepare over one hundred annual, biannual, and other reports for automatic submission to every legislator, whether or not the legislator has a concern about the report. HB 173 will require state agencies to notify the legislature when reports are available. This would cut costs. Number 118 CHAIR JAMES asked why they didn't get a negative fiscal note. REPRESENTATIVE DAVIS said he did not know why. He stated he had a sheet on it, and also a copy of all the reports that state agencies need to provide. He felt there should be a negative fiscal note. CHAIR JAMES also wondered how the copies of these reports would be stored. REPRESENTATIVE DAVIS visualized something like 15 or 20 copies of the reports that they would keep available, and they can make more as the supply is reduced. There is a considerable amount of money put out for printing, and he feels this legislation will reduce the cost. CHAIR JAMES added that some reports are very professionally done, and a certain numbers would probably have to be printed each time. Number 198 REPRESENTATIVE JOE GREEN said there are usually two or more costs for printing. There is a per-unit cost, which goes down as the volume goes up. If one thousand is the breaking point, then you save money by printing more at one time. If you guess short and have to go back and reprint some copies, the cost will be considerably higher. REPRESENTATIVE DAVIS said some departments do things differently, and costs vary. For instance, Alaska Public Offices Commission, Department of Administration, must prepare forms and manuals of instruction for use by persons required to make reports under the Campaign Disclosure, Conflict of Interest and Lobbying Laws. The completed forms are made available to the public. The cost of printing is $12,645. REPRESENTATATIVE CAREN ROBINSON expressed her support of HB 173, but she suggested that, instead of the departments sending individuals a copy of their reports, they send a list of the available reports. Legislators could recycle by distributing reports to libraries around their districts and communities. REPRESENTATIVE DAVIS thought her idea was good. He said that would not be a legal call, but rather a policy call. It would not have to be in statute. Number 271 REPRESENTATIVE JAMES added that reports should be put on computer to reduce the amount of paper-packing. With the technology today, it is ridiculous that we have all this paper. If the reports were on computer they could be read on the screen, and, if desired, printed out. Number 313 DANITH WATTS, Budget Analyst, Office of Management and Budget, Office of the Governor, testified on HB 173, saying that the Governor's Office is "Certainly for the concept of less paper floating around." She did not have a fiscal note because it is very difficult at this point to calculate what the cost would be. They know this legislation will not cost anything, which is why they put the fiscal note at zero. It could very well turn out to be a negative fiscal note in the long run. REPRESENTATIVE JAMES asked about the average number of copies that our 60 legislators might print. Ms. Watts could not give her a figure; it would depend on the size and number of the reports. Number 370 REPRESENTATIVE ED WILLIS moved to pass the bill out of committee with individual recommendations. There being no objection, it was so moved.