HJR 4: LIMITING TERMS OF LEGISLATURE CHAIRMAN VEZEY read the title of HJR 4. He noted HJR 4 would allow for three terms in the House and two in the Senate. He invited the sponsor, Representative Jim Nordlund, to testify. Number 499 REPRESENTATIVE JIM NORDLUND, PRIME SPONSOR of HJR 4, stated term limits were a campaign issue for him. He believed there was a need for more responsive, effective and fair campaigning, and pointed out that HJR 4 did not limit consecutive service in that there was no limit of total time served and no lifetime ban. REPRESENTATIVE NORDLUND stated the incumbent had a benefit of using public staff, money was easier to raise, and there was more name recognition. There was just too much advantage over the general public, and the public desired a term limit. He pointed out fourteen other states had a term limit. Number 547 CHAIRMAN VEZEY asked Representative Nordlund how he decided on the three terms in the House and two in the Senate. Number 544 REPRESENTATIVE NORDLUND decided the first term was needed to learn the process, the second to continue what was started the first term, and a third to be in leadership. There needed to be a balance with the experience in the executive branch to the experience in the legislative branch, he added. Number 583 REPRESENTATIVE KOTT explained another difference in HJR 4 compared to HJR 3, that being a legislator could go from the House to the Senate back to the House and then to the Senate indefinitely. Number 591 REPRESENTATIVE NORDLUND stated the legislator would still have to challenge the incumbent.