HRES - 03/08/95 HB 195 - REPEAL MILK MARKETING LAWS REPRESENTATIVE AL VEZEY, PRIME SPONSOR, stated last year, the legislature repealed the milk marketing board along with a number of other boards and commissions. He said the statute regarding the state regulating the marketing of milk is still on the books. He explained HB 195 would simply remove that statute from the books and relieve the Department of Natural Resources (DNR) of an obligation to administer another part of the market. REPRESENTATIVE VEZEY said it was his understanding that there are people in Alaska opposed to the repeal of this regulation because they think the state should be in the business of regulating milk marketing. He felt the statute should be taken off the books. CO-CHAIRMAN GREEN agreed. He said the committee substitute would only place a period after the word "orders" in the title of HB 195. Therefore, the title would read, "An Act repealing the laws authorizing milk marketing orders." REPRESENTATIVE VEZEY said that is correct. He added that the statute has been on the books since 1962 and to date there has never been a milk order issued. Number 094 NICO BUS, ACTING DIRECTOR, DIVISION OF SUPPORT SERVICES, DNR, said the department is neutral on HB 195. The department currently does not have any activity in milk marketing orders. He stated the market is such that milk has to be purchased from the outside. He noted if that fact would change, this statute would enable the department to do the milk marketing ordering. CO-CHAIRMAN GREEN noted attempts at the dairy industry in the state have not been successful. He wondered if the state re-energized a local dairy industry, what effect would HB 195 have. MR. BUS responded with the mental health settlement and the Point McKenzie properties, some grazing lands might become available for dairy. He said if that would happen and there was a surplus of milk, this statute would be useful. Number 143 CO-CHAIRMAN GREEN clarified that HB 195 is merely a house cleaning measure to clean up laws no longer applicable. MR. VEZEY replied the bill is an effort to clean up the statute but it is also questionable, without a commission, whether or not the statute can be administered. He also felt the state should not be regulating commodities. CO-CHAIRMAN GREEN clarified if the state got a viable dairy industry going, Representative Vezey feels there is no need for this statute. MR. VEZEY replied no. He said the statute was put together at a time when dairy output was allocated. The idea was the state would allocate production quotas to different dairies. He stated it is not an area of commerce the state needs to be regulating. He noted the sector of the state's economy where agriculture is being successful is where it has minimal government regulation. REPRESENTATIVE ALAN AUSTERMAN made a MOTION to AMEND HB 195 to change the title to read, "An Act repealing the laws authorizing milk marketing order." CO-CHAIRMAN GREEN asked if there were any objections. Hearing none, the MOTION PASSED. Number 188 REPRESENTATIVE AUSTERMAN made a MOTION to MOVE CSHB 195(RES) with accompanying zero fiscal note with individual recommendations. CO-CHAIRMAN GREEN asked if there were any objections. Hearing none, the MOTION PASSED.