SJR 13 - Export Of Alaska Oil SENATOR JOHNNY ELLIS, PRIME SPONSOR, stated SJR 13 is a fairly straightforward resolution. A lot of revenue is at stake - about $2.5 billion since 1974, when the unfair ban on the export of crude oil was placed on the state. He added there are billions of dollars at stake in the future. He stated most people have become familiar with the favorable reasons why the ban should be lifted. SENATOR ELLIS said there is a lot of work ongoing currently with the Department of Energy. He is providing information to them to affect their recommendation, and added there will be hearings this spring on the Export Administration Act which is up for renewal in April. He felt it was important to move SJR 13 along as quickly as possible in order to send a clear message to Congress and the President that the state would like to see the situation change, as it is unacceptable. The study that the Energy Department is conducting is on the pros and cons to the nation. He said the pros for Alaska are known, but the leaders elected at the federal level have a responsibility for the entire nation. Alaska does have allies in California. Senator Ellis stated it is a good environment currently. Number 418 REPRESENTATIVE GREEN said there is a zero fiscal note and he felt there should be a strongly positive fiscal note. He stated he is getting disgusted with the state's departments constantly giving zero fiscal notes when quite often there is a cost or a benefit. He suggested as the resolution moves along, that a fiscal note be attached showing that the lifting of the ban is in the state's favor. SENATOR ELLIS agreed. He said that Governor Hickel also mentioned the $2.5 billion figure in his State of the State address. He noted there may be an analysis attached or in the file, which makes reference to the money lost in the past and what is to be gained in the future. Number 450 VICE CHAIRMAN HUDSON said there really is an opportunity and felt there is a need to do some work on the West Coast and with the major producers, who have said they really do not have a great incentive to support this resolution, since they own many of the facilities on the West Coast, etc. He felt there is a corporate conflict as far as Alaska's interests are concerned. He stated at a previous meeting, there was a suggestion of spending time and money and sending a delegation to go down and talk with the western states, as there is an advantage to them also. Number 479 REPRESENTATIVE FINKELSTEIN made a motion to MOVE CSSJR 13(RLS) out of committee with INDIVIDUAL RECOMMENDATIONS. VICE CHAIRMAN HUDSON asked if there were objections. Hearing none, the MOTION PASSED. ANNOUNCEMENTS VICE CHAIRMAN HUDSON announced there will be no committee meeting on Monday, February 21. On Wednesday, February 23 the committee will meet at 8:15 a.m. to hear HB 199, HB 398, HJR 55 and HJR 56. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business to come before the House Resources Committee, Vice Chairman Hudson adjourned the meeting at 9:45 a.m.