HB 282-LANDLORD AND TENANT ACT  3:26:32 PM CHAIR OLSON announced that the next order of business would be HOUSE BILL NO. 282, "An Act relating to the rights and obligations of residential landlords and tenants; and relating to the taking of a permanent fund dividend for rent and damages owed to a residential landlord." [Before the committee was Version O, labeled 28-LS0930\0, Bullock, 2/22/14 adopted on 2/28/14.] 3:27:01 PM REPRESENTATIVE DOUG ISAACSON, Alaska State Legislature, introduced himself. 3:27:45 PM CHAIR OLSON said that the bill has had several hearings and a proposed committee substitute for HB 282, Version O, was adopted. He said the committee had questions about "normal wear and tear." 3:28:16 PM CLYDE (ED) SNIFFEN, JR., Senior Assistant Attorney General, Commercial/Fair Business Section, Civil Division, Department of Law (DOL), as the assistant attorney general for consumer protection was asked by the sponsor to address Mr. Block's concern about "normal wear and tear." He explained that it is a difficult term to define and the more attempts that are made to define it, the more problematic it becomes. He compared the term as being similar to the "reasonable person" standard, which is the standard used for most torts in Alaska. Although the term is always used to set a standard of care, it is best left to the judge and jury to decide its meaning. He said that "normal wear and tear" is another one of those terms, and the language in the statute is probably as close as one might get. He offered to work with Mr. Block to attempt to further refine the language. He cautioned the committee against trying to "drill down" on something too detailed since the more detailed it becomes the bigger the target it becomes in potential disputes. For example, he asked whether the definition will include the quality of construction or be related to the number of people living in the residence. He suggested that if some things are included it might mean that everything not included automatically does not fall under "normal wear and tear." In its current form the bill addresses "normal wear and tear" such that in reasonable fact finding a judge or jury can consider it on a case-by-case basis. He suggested that trying to get to something more specific can definitely be problematic. 3:30:51 PM REPRESENTATIVE ISAACSON pointed out that the term has been defined in other states and other states have explored the term, such as California and New York. He explained that a body of work can be relied on since courts rely on precedent. CHAIR OLSON stated that Mr. Sniffen "carries the most weight" and it is less important what other states have done. CHAIR OLSON, after first determining no one else wished to testify, closed public testimony on HB 282. 3:32:35 PM REPRESENTATIVE REINBOLD moved to report the proposed committee substitute (CS) for HB 282, Version O, labeled 28-LS0930\O, Bullock, 2/22/14, as amended, out of committee with individual recommendations and the accompanying fiscal notes. There being no objection, CSHB 282(L&C) was reported from the House Labor & Commerce Standing Committee.