HB 34 - FEDERAL LAWS, REGULATIONS & EXEC. ORDERS  1:05:39 PM CHAIR KELLER announced that the first order of business would be HOUSE BILL NO. 34, "An Act making state compliance with a federal law, regulation, or presidential executive order contingent on receipt of certain information from the federal government." [Before the committee was a proposed committee substitute (CS) for HB 34, Version 28-LS0195\C, Nauman, 1/30/13, adopted as the working document on 2/25/13; included in members' packets was a new proposed CS for HB 34, Version 28-LS0195\O, Nauman, 4/1/13.] 1:06:09 PM REPRESENTATIVE LYNN moved to adopt the proposed committee substitute (CS) for HB 34, Version 28-LS0195\O, Nauman, 4/1/13, as the working document. There being no objection, Version O was before the committee. 1:06:41 PM REPRESENTATIVE TAMMIE WILSON, Alaska State Legislature, sponsor, mentioning that she would be working during the interim to address concerns with HB 34, explained that Version O of the bill would preclude the state from complying with a federal law, federal regulation, or presidential executive order until the state requests from the federal government a written report on the economic effect - on the state, on the community, on industry, and on the local government - of complying with the federal law, federal regulation, or presidential executive order; and would preclude the state from accepting any associated federal funding until either the federal government or the state provides that written report. Under Version O, the state would request the written report from the federal government, but if the federal government does not provide it within 90 days, then the state would instead prepare the report and transmit it to the legislature. REPRESENTATIVE T. WILSON explained that also under Version O, the state would be required to complete a similar report for all state laws, state regulations, and executive orders; the Administrative Regulation Review Committee would be required to provide certain types of information about proposed regulations in its statutorily-required notifications, and would be required to submit comments to the lieutenant governor on the proposed regulations prior to those regulations being filed by the lieutenant governor; and the lieutenant governor would in turn [be required to review those comments, and would] have the discretion to return the proposed regulations to the appropriate department for further consideration. The changes proposed by HB 34, she proffered, would result in the state and industry having a better understanding of the economic ramifications of federal and state laws, regulations, and executive orders, and thereby be better-equipped to make decisions. In conclusion, she reiterated that she would be working during the interim to address concerns with HB 34. [HB 34, Version O, was held over.]